Cited by 356Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTreatment of Major Depression

A multicenter pilot study of subcallosal cingulate area deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Clinical article

Lozano, Andres M., Giacobbe, Peter, Hamani, Clement, Rizvi, Sakina J., Kennedy, Sidney H., Kolivakis, Theodore T., Debonnel, Guy, Sadikot, Abbas F. +5 more·2012·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been recently investigated as a treatment for major depression. One of the proposed targets for this application is the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG). To date, promising results after SCG DBS have been reported by a single center. In the present study the authors investigated whether these findings may be replicated at different institutions. They conducted a 3-center prospective open-label trial of SCG DBS for 12 months in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Methods: Twenty-one patients underwent implantation of bilateral SCG electrodes. The authors examined the reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) score from baseline (RESP50). Results: Patients treated with SCG DBS had an RESP50 of 57% at 1 month, 48% at 6 months, and 29% at 12 months. The response rate after 12 months of DBS, however, increased to 62% when defined as a reduction in the baseline HRSD-17 of 40% or more. Reductions in depressive symptomatology were associated with amelioration in disease severity in patients who responded to surgery. Conclusions: Overall, findings from this study corroborate the results of previous reports showing that outcome of SCG DBS may be replicated across centers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2011.10.jns102122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 356

Authors
Lozano, A. M., Giacobbe, P., Hamani, C., Rizvi, S. J., Kennedy, S. H., Kolivakis, T. T., Debonnel, G., Sadikot, A. F., Lam, R. W., Howard, A. K., Ilcewicz-Klimek, M., Honey, C. R., & Mayberg, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Division of Neurosurgery and
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery and
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
  • Division of Surgery (Neurosurgery) and
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2012-02
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
315-322
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W2128682567
Cited by
356
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 22
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, response rate, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, depression severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Corpus Callosum, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review