A multicenter pilot study of subcallosal cingulate area deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Clinical article
Abstract
Object: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been recently investigated as a treatment for major depression. One of the proposed targets for this application is the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG). To date, promising results after SCG DBS have been reported by a single center. In the present study the authors investigated whether these findings may be replicated at different institutions. They conducted a 3-center prospective open-label trial of SCG DBS for 12 months in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Methods: Twenty-one patients underwent implantation of bilateral SCG electrodes. The authors examined the reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) score from baseline (RESP50). Results: Patients treated with SCG DBS had an RESP50 of 57% at 1 month, 48% at 6 months, and 29% at 12 months. The response rate after 12 months of DBS, however, increased to 62% when defined as a reduction in the baseline HRSD-17 of 40% or more. Reductions in depressive symptomatology were associated with amelioration in disease severity in patients who responded to surgery. Conclusions: Overall, findings from this study corroborate the results of previous reports showing that outcome of SCG DBS may be replicated across centers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neurostimulatory treatments such as ECT, TMS, or deep brain stimulation can be effective to some extent, but none are 100% effective.
“Patients who fail repeated medication trials, hospitalisation, and psychotherapy sometimes go on to try neurostimulatory treatments, such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or deep brain stimulation, all of which can be effective to some extent; but none are 100% effective.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 356
- Authors
- Lozano, A. M., Giacobbe, P., Hamani, C., Rizvi, S. J., Kennedy, S. H., Kolivakis, T. T., Debonnel, G., Sadikot, A. F., Lam, R. W., Howard, A. K., Ilcewicz-Klimek, M., Honey, C. R., & Mayberg, H. S.
- Affiliations
- Division of Neurosurgery and
- University Health Network (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery and
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
- Division of Surgery (Neurosurgery) and
- Emory University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-322
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0693
- OpenAlex
- W2128682567
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 21.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, response rate, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, depression severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Corpus Callosum, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Deep Brain Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review