Detection of β-amyloid oligomers as a predictor of neurological outcome after brain injury: Laboratory investigation
Abstract
Object: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer-like dementia. In previous studies, an increase in β-amyloid (Aβ) monomers, such as β-amyloid 42 (Aβ42), in the CSF of patients with TBI has been shown to correlate with a decrease in amyloid plaques in the brain and improved neurological outcomes. In this study, the authors hypothesized that the levels of toxic high-molecular-weight β-amyloid oligomers are increased in the brain and are detectable within the CSF of TBI patients with poor neurological outcomes. Methods: Samples of CSF were collected from 18 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale Scores 3–8) and a ventriculostomy. In all cases the CSF was collected within 72 hours of injury. The CSF levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and Aβ42 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The levels of high-molecular-weight β-amyloid oligomers were measured using Western blot analysis. Results: Patients with good outcomes showed an increase in the levels of CSF Aβ42 (p = 0.003). Those with bad outcomes exhibited an increase in CSF levels of β-amyloid oligomers (p = 0.009) and NSE (p = 0.001). In addition, the CSF oligomer levels correlated with the scores on the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (r = −0.89, p = 0.0001), disability rating scale scores (r = 0.77, p = 0.005), CSF Aβ42 levels (r = −0.42, p = 0.12), and CSF NSE levels (r = 0.70, p = 0.004). Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve for β-amyloid oligomers of 0.8750 ± 0.09. Conclusions: Detection of β-amyloid oligomers may someday become a useful clinical tool for determining injury severity and neurological outcomes in patients with TBI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher levels of CSF Aβ oligomers predict poor neurological recovery following severe TBI.
“higher levels of CSF Aβ oligomers predict poor neurological recovery (141).”
From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [141]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Gatson, J. W., Warren, V., Abdelfattah, K., Wolf, S., Hynan, L. S., Moore, C., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Minei, J. P., Madden, C., & Wigginton, J. G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1336-1342
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0693
- OpenAlex
- W1846092430
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta oligomers, traumatic brain injury, neurological outcome prediction, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta 42, neuron-specific enolase, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, injury severity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oligonucleotides, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Glasgow Coma Scale, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review