Cited by 59Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

5-Aminolevulinic acid for enhanced surgical visualization of high-grade gliomas: a prospective, multicenter study

Schupper, Alexander J., Baron, Rebecca B., Cheung, William, Rodriguez, Jessica, Kalkanis, Steven N., Chohan, Muhammad O., Andersen, Bruce J., Chamoun, Roukoz +16 more·2022·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Greater extent of resection (EOR) is associated with longer overall survival in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs). 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) can increase EOR by improving intraoperative visualization of contrast-enhancing tumor during fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). When administered orally, 5-ALA is converted by glioma cells into protoporphyrin IX (PPIX), which fluoresces under blue 400-nm light. 5-ALA has been available for use in Europe since 2010, but only recently gained FDA approval as an intraoperative imaging agent for HGG tissue. In this first-ever, to the authors' knowledge, multicenter 5-ALA FGS study conducted in the United States, the primary objectives were the following: 1) assess the diagnostic accuracy of 5-ALA-induced PPIX fluorescence for HGG histopathology across diverse centers and surgeons; and 2) assess the safety profile of 5-ALA FGS, with particular attention to neurological morbidity. METHODS: This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study included adults aged 18-80 years with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score > 60 and an MRI diagnosis of suspected new or recurrent resectable HGG. Intraoperatively, 3-5 samples per tumor were taken and their fluorescence status was recorded by the surgeon. Specimens were submitted for histopathological analysis. Patients were followed for 6 weeks postoperatively for adverse events, changes in the neurological exam, and KPS score. Multivariate analyses were performed of the outcomes of KPS decline, EOR, and residual enhancing tumor volume to identify predictive patient and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients underwent 5-ALA FGS, providing 275 tumor samples for analysis. PPIX fluorescence had a sensitivity of 96.5%, specificity of 29.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) for HGG histopathology of 95.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 92.4%. Drug-related adverse events occurred at a rate of 22%. Serious adverse events due to intraoperative neurological injury, which may have resulted from FGS, occurred at a rate of 4.3%. There were 2 deaths unrelated to FGS. Compared to preoperative KPS scores, postoperative KPS scores were significantly lower at 48 hours and 2 weeks but were not different at 6 weeks postoperatively. Complete resection of enhancing tumor occurred in 51.9% of patients. Smaller preoperative tumor volume and use of intraoperative MRI predicted lower residual tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS: PPIX fluorescence, as judged by the surgeon, has a high sensitivity and PPV for HGG. 5-ALA was well tolerated in terms of drug-related adverse events, and its application by trained surgeons in FGS for HGGs was not associated with any excess neurological morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2021.5.jns21310

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recently completed multi-center U.S. clinical study confirmed that ALA is well-tolerated and possesses high sensitivity and positive predictive value as a tumor diagnostic agent for high-grade gliomas.

    “A recently completed multi-center clinical study in the U.S. further confirmed that ALA is well-tolerated and possesses high sensitivity and positive predictive value as a tumor diagnostic agent for high-grade gliomas [49].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 59

Authors
Schupper, A. J., Baron, R. B., Cheung, W., Rodriguez, J., Kalkanis, S. N., Chohan, M. O., Andersen, B. J., Chamoun, R., Nahed, B. V., Zacharia, B. E., Kennedy, J., Moulding, H. D., Zucker, L., Chicoine, M. R., Olson, J. J., Jensen, R. L., Sherman, J. H., Zhang, X., Price, G., Fowkes, M., Germano, I. M., Carter, B. S., Hadjipanayis, C. G., & Yong, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurological Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York;
  • Mount Sinai Health System (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • University of New Mexico Hospital (US)
  • Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
  • CentraCare Health System (US)
  • St. Luke's University Health Network (US)
  • Delray Medical Center (US)
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
  • Emory University Hospital (US)
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
  • George Washington University Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
136
Issue
6
Pages
1525-1534
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W3203796019
Cited by
59
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
5-aminolevulinic acid, fluorescence-guided surgery, high-grade glioma, protoporphyrin IX, extent of resection, diagnostic accuracy, histopathological correlation, drug safety, Karnofsky performance status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review