The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury
Abstract
✓ Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), cerebral intraventricular pressure (IVP), systemic arterial blood pressure, and cerebral ventricular fluid (CSF) lactate and pH were studied repeatedly in 23 patients during the acute phase of severe brain injury lasting from 3 to 21 days after the trauma. Cerebrovascular autoregulation was tested repeatedly by means of angiotensin infusion in 21 of the patients, and CO 2 response in 14 by means of passive hyperventilation. The pressure in the brain ventricles was measured continuously in all patients and kept below 45 mm Hg during the study. If the IVP increased more than 10 mm Hg during the angiotensin infusion (as in one case), the autoregulation test was considered contraindicated and the angiotensin infusion was discontinued. Dissociation between cerebrovascular autoregulation and CO 2 response was a common phenomenon. Typically, autoregulation appeared preserved in the most severely injured areas of the cerebral cortex when the patient was deeply comatose, but deteriorated concomitantly with recovery; by the time the patient became alert, the autoregulation was always impaired. The CO 2 response was impaired only in patients who were deeply comatose and had attacks of decerebrate rigidity; during recovery the CO 2 response became normal. Thus, preserved autoregulation associated with impaired CO 2 response indicated very severe brain damage, whereas impaired autoregulation associated with preserved CO 2 response suggested moderate or severe brain damage in recovery. These paradoxical observations raise the question whether the preserved autoregulation seen in severely injured brain tissue is a true autoregulation caused by an active vasoconstrictor response to an increase in blood pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury
Werner, C., & Engelhard, K. (2007) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem131 · Cited by 1,712
Obrist, W. D., Langfitt, T. W., Jaggi, J. L., Cruz, J., & Gennarelli, T. A. (1984) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0241 · Cited by 835
Field, M., Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.190 · Cited by 802
Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury
Robertson, C. S., Valadka, A. B., Hannay, H. J., Contant, C. F., Gopinath, S. P., Cormio, M., Uzura, M., & Grossman, R. G. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199910000-00002 · Cited by 748
Spreading Depression, Spreading Depolarizations, and the Cerebral Vasculature
Ayata, C., & Lauritzen, M. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2014 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Enevoldsen, E. M., & Jensen, F. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1978-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 689-703
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028995385
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1978.48.5.0689
- The paper
- Enevoldsen, E. M., & Jensen, F. T. (1978). Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1978.48.5.0689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.