The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Results of shunting in 62 patients
Abstract
✓ Of 62 patients given shunts for normal-pressure hydrocephalus of idiopathic type, 46.8% showed some improvement and 27.4% enjoyed virtually complete recovery. The best clinical predictor of good response was the complete triad of memory difficulty, gait disorder, and urine incontinence; 61.2% of patients with this combination of symptoms improved. Gait disturbance alone was also accompanied by improvement in two of three patients. An “obstructive” cisternographic radioisotope pattern was not significantly different from a “normal” pattern in predicting a response to shunting. Computerized tomography (CT) showing large ventricles and little atrophy predicted improvement in 11 out of 13 patients. There were five deaths within 3 months of shunting. The complication rate was 35.4%; subdural collections, shunt malfunction, and postoperative seizures constituted the most frequent complications. These data suggest that continued investigation for better predictions of shunt response is important, but that in the meantime the clinical pattern and cranial CT pattern are the most satisfactory guides to improvement after shunting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Symptomatic Occult Hydrocephalus with Normal Cerebrospinal-Fluid Pressure: A Treatable Syndrome
Adams, R. D., Fisher, C. M., Hakim, S., Ojemann, R. G., & Sweet, W. H. (1965) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196507152730301 · Cited by 1,370
Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure".
Bh, M. (1970) · PubMed · Cited by 1,035
Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Predicting the results of cerebrospinal fluid shunting
Stein, S. C., & Langfitt, T. W. (1974) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1974.41.4.0463 · Cited by 385
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-- a report of 73 patients.
Greenberg, J. O., Shenkin, H. A., & Adam, R. (1977) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.40.4.336 · Cited by 143
Abnormal Isotope Cisternography in Symptomatic Occult Hydrocephalus
Heinz, E. R., Davis, D. O., & Karp, H. R. (1970) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/95.1.109 · Cited by 72
Cited by
NAKAJIMA, M., YAMADA, S., MIYAJIMA, M., ISHII, K., KURIYAMA, N., KAZUI, H., KANEMOTO, H., SUEHIRO, T., YOSHIYAMA, K., KAMEDA, M., et al. (2021) · Neurologia medico-chirurgica · doi:10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292 · Cited by 594
Deconstructing normal pressure hydrocephalus: ventriculomegaly as early sign of neurodegeneration
Espay, A. J., Da Prat, G. A., Dwivedi, A. K., Rodriguez‐Porcel, F., Vaughan, J. E., Rosso, M., Devoto, J. L., Duker, A. P., Masellis, M., Smith, C. D., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25046 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Black, P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-377
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1556751542
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Results of shunting in 62 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1980.52.3.0371
- The paper
- Black, P. M. (1980). Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Results of shunting in 62 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.52.3.0371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.