The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computerized tomographic and pathologic studies of the untreated, quiescent, and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
Abstract
✓ Pathological findings in 20 cases of glioblastoma multiforme were correlated with clinical histories and computerized tomographic (CT) scans. This was done to define the neoplasm in three stages: before treatment, during remission, and during recurrence. The untreated lesions were markedly cellular neoplasms composed predominantly of small anaplastic cells. The radiographic central region of low density was necrosis, the enhancing rim was a cellular zone of viable neoplasm, and the perilesional low-density area was edema with infiltrating tumor. In these 20 cases, all of the identifiable neoplasms lay within the zone of peritumoral edema or contrast enhancement, although small anaplastic cells may have been present in more distant regions. The lesions in remission were remarkable for their minimal mass effect, discrete nature, extensive necrosis, and content of large bizarre glia. The large cells were confined to the original tumor bed and were consistent with neoplastic cells inactivated and immobilized by radio- and chemotherapy. These lesions were accurately localized by CT scanning. The recurrent lesions were heterogeneous, but most were formed of widely disseminated small anaplastic cells. The highly cellular regions of such lesions could be localized by CT scanning, but CT could not detect less cellular foci in the cerebrum, cerebellum, or brain stem. In one patient, the contrast-enhancing lesions of “recurrence,” were foci of radionecrosis, underscoring the difficulty in distinguishing this entity from recurrent neoplasm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1996) · PubMed · Cited by 1,188
Minniti, G., Amelio, D., Amichetti, M., Salvati, M., Muni, R., Bozzao, A., Lanzetta, G., Scarpino, S., Arcella, A., & Enrici, R. M. (2010) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.020 · Cited by 323
Hoelzinger, D. B., Mariani, L., Weis, J., Woyke, T., Berens, T. J., McDonough, W., Sloan, A., Coons, S. W., & Berens, M. E. (2005) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1593/neo.04535 · Cited by 323
Metzincin proteases and their inhibitors: foes or friends in nervous system physiology?
Rivera, S., Khrestchatisky, M., Kaczmarek, L., Rosenberg, G. A., & Jaworski, D. M. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3467-10.2010 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Burger, P. C., Dubois, P. J., Schold, S. C., Smith, K. R., Odom, G. L., Crafts, D. C., & Giangaspero, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-169
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075102690
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computerized tomographic and pathologic studies of the untreated, quiescent, and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0159
- The paper
- Burger, P. C., Dubois, P. J., Schold, S. C., Smith, K. R., Odom, G. L., Crafts, D. C., & Giangaspero, F. (1983). Computerized tomographic and pathologic studies of the untreated, quiescent, and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.