The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion: A computerized tomography study
Abstract
✓ The influence of the type of intracranial lesion on the final outcome in a consecutive series of 277 severely head-injured patients was analyzed. Patients were studied with computerized tomograpy (CT) and underwent continuous measurement of intracranial pressure. They received identical treatment according to a standardized protocol. Outcome of patients with either epidural hematoma (38 cases), subdural hematoma (56 cases), brain contusion (87 cases), or diffuse brain damage (96 cases) was rather heterogeneous, and serial CT scanning allowed the authors to outline eight consistent anatomical patterns in the whole series which have stronger prognostic significance than the four major lesion categories mentioned above. Patients with pure extracerebral hematoma (19 cases), single brain contusion (45 cases), general brain swelling (41 cases), and normal CT scans (28 cases) had a significantly better outcome than patients developing acute hemispheric swelling after operation for a large extracerebral hematoma (27 cases), patients with multiple brain contusion, either unilateral or bilateral (74 cases), and patients with diffuse axonal injury (43 cases). These anatomical patterns are interesting because, in addition to having clinical and physiopathological significance, they provide useful prognostic information and facilitate improved therapeutic decision-making in severely head-injured patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Outcome following severe head injuries in children
Bruce, D. A., Schut, L., Bruno, L. A., Wood, J. H., & Sutton, L. N. (1978) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1978.48.5.0679 · Cited by 347
Cited by
Nelson, L. D., Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S., Barber, J., Giacino, J. T., Yuh, E., Levin, H. S., McCrea, M. A., Stein, M. B., Mukherjee, P., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobato, R. D., Cordobes, F., Rivas, J. J., de la Fuente, M., Montero, A., Barcena, A., Perez, C., Cabrera, A., & Lamas, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 762-774
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101765440
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion: A computerized tomography study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0762
- The paper
- Lobato, R. D., Cordobes, F., Rivas, J. J., de la Fuente, M., Montero, A., Barcena, A., Perez, C., Cabrera, A., & Lamas, E. (1983). Outcome from severe head injury related to the type of intracranial lesion: A computerized tomography study. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.