The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intrinsic brain-stem tumors of childhood: surgical indications
Abstract
✓ This report summarizes the first author's experience with radical excision of intrinsic non-exophytic brain-stem gliomas in 34 pediatric patients. On retrospective analysis, these tumors may be classified into three subgroups: focal, diffuse, and cervicomedullary. A focal neoplasm is a circumscribed mass less than 2 cm in diameter and without associated edema. Tumors of a larger size or in which the “focal” neoplasm is associated with a large area of apparent edema are classified as diffuse. Cervicomedullary neoplasms occur at the junction of the medulla and spinal cord and involve both of the structures but do not extend rostrally into the pons. A radical tumor excision was carried out in all patients, and the only mortality and morbidity occurred in children harboring diffuse gliomas. All of the diffuse gliomas were malignant (grade III or IV astrocytomas), whereas three of the four focal astrocytomas and all of the cervicomedullary tumors were grade II astrocytomas. No patient with a diffuse astrocytoma was benefitted by surgery, while two of the focal astrocytomas and all of the cervicomedullary neoplasms either became stable or improved postoperatively. It is concluded that, although surgery may be accomplished within the substance of the brain stem with low morbidity and mortality rates, it is not indicated for malignant astrocytomas as it has no impact on the biology of the neoplasm. Therefore, while primary radical excision is recommended for cervicomedullary neoplasms, which are often benign, the more traditional radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy remain appropriate for tumors above the medulla.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ishii, N., Maier, D., Merlo, A., Tada, M., Sawamura, Y., Diserens, A., & Van Meir, E. G. (1999) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.1999.tb00536.x · Cited by 569
Brain and Other Central Nervous System Cancers: Recent Trends in Incidence and Mortality
Legler, J. M., Ries, L. A. G., Smith, M. A., Warren, J. L., Heineman, E. F., Kaplan, R. S., & Linet, M. S. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.16.1382 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Epstein, F., & McCleary, E. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-15
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158028846
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic brain-stem tumors of childhood: surgical indications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1986.64.1.0011
- The paper
- Epstein, F., & McCleary, E. L. (1986). Intrinsic brain-stem tumors of childhood: surgical indications. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.64.1.0011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.