Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme

Burger, Peter C., Heinz, E. Ralph, Shibata, Taichiro, Kleihues, Paul·1988·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ To provide baseline information for the “local” therapy of the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), whole-brain histological sections of 15 untreated GBM's were studied to determine the distribution of neoplastic cells. These findings were then compared with the computerized tomography (CT) scans in 11 cases in order to determine the extent to which the peripheral portion of the neoplasm can be estimated by the presence of a low-density area without contrast enhancement. The results of the histological study confirmed the marked heterogeneity of GBM's and disclosed a great variability in the geometry, extent, and character of the peripheral “infiltrating” margin. In spite of the widely held concept that glioblastomas are localized within 2 cm of the contrast-enhanced rim, there were three cases in this two-dimensional study in which this distance was exceeded, and it seems likely that three-dimensional reconstructions would have detected additional cases in which neoplastic cells extended beyond this arbitrary limit. Only three of the 15 GBM's were restricted to the distribution of one internal carotid or one vertebral artery. To the extent that the neoplasms in the present series are representative, this suggests that glioblastomas will be difficult to treat successfully by intra-arterial therapy using existing therapeutic agents. Correlations of histological sections with the CT scans revealed that the vast majority of the neoplastic tissue was contained within the contrast-enhancing and “peritumoral” areas of low density, but that in five cases fingers of neoplasm extended for short distances beyond the outer margin of the latter region. This indicates that the distribution of cells of a GBM cannot be inferred from CT images since the “peritumoral” area of low density can over- or underestimate the extent of the lesion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0698

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Burger, P. C., Heinz, E. R., Shibata, T., & Kleihues, P.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1988-05
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
698-704
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999778470
Cited by
452
References
0
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0698
The paper
Burger, P. C., Heinz, E. R., Shibata, T., & Kleihues, P. (1988). Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0698

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.