The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme
Abstract
✓ To provide baseline information for the “local” therapy of the glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), whole-brain histological sections of 15 untreated GBM's were studied to determine the distribution of neoplastic cells. These findings were then compared with the computerized tomography (CT) scans in 11 cases in order to determine the extent to which the peripheral portion of the neoplasm can be estimated by the presence of a low-density area without contrast enhancement. The results of the histological study confirmed the marked heterogeneity of GBM's and disclosed a great variability in the geometry, extent, and character of the peripheral “infiltrating” margin. In spite of the widely held concept that glioblastomas are localized within 2 cm of the contrast-enhanced rim, there were three cases in this two-dimensional study in which this distance was exceeded, and it seems likely that three-dimensional reconstructions would have detected additional cases in which neoplastic cells extended beyond this arbitrary limit. Only three of the 15 GBM's were restricted to the distribution of one internal carotid or one vertebral artery. To the extent that the neoplasms in the present series are representative, this suggests that glioblastomas will be difficult to treat successfully by intra-arterial therapy using existing therapeutic agents. Correlations of histological sections with the CT scans revealed that the vast majority of the neoplastic tissue was contained within the contrast-enhancing and “peritumoral” areas of low density, but that in five cases fingers of neoplasm extended for short distances beyond the outer margin of the latter region. This indicates that the distribution of cells of a GBM cannot be inferred from CT images since the “peritumoral” area of low density can over- or underestimate the extent of the lesion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brown, T. J., Brennan, M. C., Li, M., Church, E. W., Brandmeir, N. J., Rakszawski, K. L., Patel, A. S., Rizk, E. B., Suki, D., Sawaya, R., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1373 · Cited by 1,081
Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases
Rao, J. S. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1121 · Cited by 847
Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion
Swanson, K. R., Bridge, C., Murray, J. D., & Alvord, E. C. (2003) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2003.06.001 · Cited by 594
Three-dimensional microsurgical and tractographic anatomy of the white matter of the human brain
Fernández-Miranda, J. C., Rhoton, A. L., Álvarez-Linera, J., Kakizawa, Y., Choi, C., & de Oliveira, E. P. (2008) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000333767.05328.49 · Cited by 347
Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas
Watanabe, M., Tanaka, R., & Takeda, N. (1992) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/bf00598951 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Burger, P. C., Heinz, E. R., Shibata, T., & Kleihues, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 698-704
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999778470
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0698
- The paper
- Burger, P. C., Heinz, E. R., Shibata, T., & Kleihues, P. (1988). Topographic anatomy and CT correlations in the untreated glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.68.5.0698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.