The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis
Abstract
✓ One-hundred patients who had undergone decompressive surgery for lumbar stenosis between 1980 and 1985 were evaluated as to their long-term outcome. Four patients with postfusion stenosis were included. A 5-year follow-up period was achieved in 88 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and 80% were over 60 years of age. There was a high incidence of coexisting medical diseases, but the principal disability was lumbar stenosis with neurological involvement. Results were categorized as either a surgical success or a failure. depending upon the achievement of preset goals within the context of lifestyle and needs. There were no perioperative complications. Initially there was a high incidence of success, but recurrence of neurological involvement and persistence of low-back pain led to an increasing number of failures. By 5 years this number had reached 27% of the available population pool, suggesting that the failure rate could reach 50% within the projected life expectancies of most patients. Of the 26 failures, 16 were secondary to renewed neurological involvement, which occurred at new levels of stenosis in eight and recurrence of stenosis at operative levels in eight. Reoperation was successful in 12 of these 16 patients, but two required a third operation. The incidence of spondylolisthesis at 5 years was higher in the surgical failures (12 of 26 patients) than in the surgical successes (16 of 64). Spondylolisthetic stenosis tended to recur within a few years following decompression. To forestall recurrences, it is suggested that stabilization be carried out at levels of spondylolisthetic stenosis and the initial decompression include adjacent levels of threatening symptomatic stenosis. However, the heterogenicity of this patient population, with varying patterns and levels of symptomatic stenosis, precludes application of rigid surgical protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fischgrund, J. S., Mackay, M., Herkowitz, H. N., Brower, R., Montgomery, D. M., & Kurz, L. T. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003 · Cited by 835
Kreiner, D. S., Shaffer, W. O., Baisden, J. L., Gilbert, T. J., Summers, J. T., Toton, J. F., Hwang, S. W., Mendel, R. C., & Reitman, C. A. (2013) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059 · Cited by 517
Thomé, C., Zevgaridis, D., Leheta, O., Bäzner, H., Pöckler-Schöniger, C., Wöhrle, J., & Schmiedek, P. (2005) · Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine · doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0129 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Caputy, A. J., & Luessenhop, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 669-676
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990321976
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1992.77.5.0669
- The paper
- Caputy, A. J., & Luessenhop, A. J. (1992). Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.77.5.0669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.