The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extracranial complications of severe head injury
Abstract
✓ In order to define the role of intracranial and extracranial complications in determining outcome from severe head injury, 734 patients from the Traumatic Coma Data Bank were analyzed. Nine classes of intracranial and 13 classes of extracranial complications occurring within the first 14 days after admission were analyzed, while controlling for age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, early hypoxia or hypotension, and severe extracranial trauma. Outcome for survivors was based on the last recorded Glasgow Outcome Scale score, obtained a median of 521 days after injury. Intracranial complications did not significantly alter outcome for the study group. Of the extracranial complications, pulmonary, cardiovascular, coagulation, and electrolyte disorders occurred most frequently at 2 to 4 days. Infections developed later, peaking at 5 to 11 days. Gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic complications followed no specific time course. Electrolyte abnormalities were the most frequent occurrence (59% of patients) but did not alter outcome. Pulmonary infections (41%), shock (29%, systemic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg for 30 minutes or more), coagulopathy (19%), and septicemia (10%) were significant independent predictors of an unfavorable outcome. Backward-elimination, stepwise logistic regression modeling indicated that the estimated reduction of unfavorable outcome was 2.9% for the elimination of pneumonia, 3.1% for coagulation disturbances, 1.5% for septicemia, and 9.3% for shock. These data suggest that extracranial complications are highly influential in determining the outcome from severe head injury and that significant improvements in outcome in a sizeable proportion of patients could be accomplished by improving the ability to prevent or reverse pneumonia, hypotension, coagulopathy, and sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Cited by
Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients
Hukkelhoven, C. W. P. M., Steyerberg, E. W., Rampen, A. J. J., Farace, E., Habbema, J. D. F., Marshall, L. F., Murray, G. D., & Maas, A. I. R. (2003) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0666 · Cited by 641
Self-citationThe duality of the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury
McIntosh, T. K., Lenzlinger, P. M., Morganti-Kossmann, M.-C., & Laurer, H. L. (2001) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1385/mn:24:1-3:169 · Cited by 428
Sasannejad, C., Ely, E. W., & Lahiri, S. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2626-z · Cited by 326
Monitoring of autoregulation using laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with head injury
Lam, J. M. K., Hsiang, J. N. K., & Poon, W. S. (1997) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0438 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Piek, J., Chesnut, R. M., Marshall, L. F., Berkum-Clark, M. V., Klauber, M. R., Blunt, B. A., Eisenberg, H. M., Jane, J. A., Marmarou, A., & Foulkes, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 901-907
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972410117
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.