Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 997

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study

Zabramski, Joseph M., Wascher, Thomas M., Spetzler, Robert F., Johnson, Blake, Golfinos, John, Drayer, Burton P., Brown, Ben, Rigamonti, Daniel, Brown, Geraldine·1994·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ Cavernous malformations are congenital abnormalities of the cerebral vessels that affect 0.5% to 0.7% of the population. They occur in two forms: a sporadic form characterized by isolated lesions, and a familial form characterized by multiple lesions with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. The management of patients with cavernous malformations, particularly those with the familial form of the disease, remains a challenge because little is known regarding the natural history. The authors report the results of an ongoing study in which six families afflicted by familial cavernous malformations have been prospectively followed with serial interviews, physical examinations, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 6- to 12-month intervals. A total of 59 members of these six families were screened for protocol enrollment; 31 (53%) had MR evidence of familial cavernous malformations. Nineteen (61%) of these 31 patients were symptomatic, with seizures in 12 (39%), recurrent headaches in 16 (52%), focal sensory/motor deficits in three (10%), and visual field deficits in two (6%). Twenty-one of these 31 patients underwent at least two serial clinical and MR imaging examinations. A total of 128 individual cavernous malformations (mean 6.5 ± 3.8 lesions/patient) were identified and followed radiographically. During a mean follow-up period of 2.2 years (range 1 to 5.5 years), serial MR images demonstrated 17 new lesions in six (29%) of the 21 patients; 13 lesions (10%) showed changes in signal characteristics, and five lesions (3.9%) changed significantly in size. The incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage was 1.1% per lesion per year. The results of this study demonstrate that the familial form of cavernous malformations is a dynamic disease; serial MR images revealed changes in the number, size, and imaging characteristics of lesions consistent with acute or resolving hemorrhage. It is believed that the de novo development of new lesions in this disease has not been previously reported. These findings suggest that patients with familial cavernous malformations require careful follow-up monitoring, and that significant changes in neurological symptoms warrant repeat MR imaging. Surgery should be considered only for lesions that produce repetitive or progressive symptoms. Prophylactic resection of asymptomatic lesions does not appear to be indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0422

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zabramski, J. M., Wascher, T. M., Spetzler, R. F., Johnson, B., Golfinos, J., Drayer, B. P., Brown, B., Rigamonti, D., & Brown, G.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1994-03
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
422-432
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051691391
Cited by
997
References
0
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.