The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome
Abstract
✓ Between May, 1988 and August, 1993, 158 patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were treated radiosurgically at the University of Florida. A mean dose of 1560 cGy was directed to the periphery of the lesions, which had a mean volume of 9 cc (0.5 to 45.3 cc). One hundred thirty-nine of these individuals were treated with one isocenter. The mean follow-up interval was 33 months with clinical information available on 153 of these patients. Patients were followed until magnetic resonance (MR) studies suggested complete AVM thrombosis. An arteriogram was then performed, if possible, to verify occlusion status. If arteriography revealed any persistent nidus at 36 months posttreatment, the residual nidus was re-treated. Outcome categories of AVMs analyzed included the following possibilities: 1) angiographic cure; 2) angiographic failure; 3) re-treatment; 4) MR image suggested cure; 5) MR image suggested failure; 6) patient refused follow-up evaluation; 7) patient lost to follow-up study; or 8) patient deceased. The endpoints for success or failure of radiosurgery were as follows: angiographic occlusion (success), re-treatment (failure), and death due to AVM hemorrhage (failure). Fifty-six patients in this series reached one of the endpoints. Successful endpoints were seen in 91% of AVMs between 1 and 4 cc in volume, 100% of AVMs 4 to 10 cc in volume, and 79% of AVMs greater than 10 cc in volume. The more traditional measure of radiosurgical success, percentage of angiograms showing complete obliteration, was obtained in 81% of AVMs between 1 and 4 cc in volume, 89% of AVMs between 4 and 10 cc in volume, and 69% of AVMs greater than 10 cc in volume. A detailed analysis of the relationship of all outcome categories to size is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bragg-peak proton-beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain
Kjellberg, R. N., Hanamura, T., Davis, K. R., Lyons, S. L., & Adams, R. D. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198308043090503 · Cited by 540
Steinberg, G. K., Fabrikant, J. I., Marks, M. P., Levy, R. P., Frankel, K. A., Phillips, M. H., Shuer, L. M., & Silverberg, G. D. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199007123230205 · Cited by 295
Cited by
The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations
Friedman, W. A., Blatt, D. L., Bova, F. J., Buatti, J. M., Mendenhall, W. M., & Kubilis, P. S. (1996) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0912 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, W. A., Bova, F. J., & Mendenhall, W. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-189
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169972640
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1995.82.2.0180
- The paper
- Friedman, W. A., Bova, F. J., & Mendenhall, W. M. (1995). Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.2.0180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.