The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients
Abstract
✓ The investigators undertook a retrospective analysis of ventriculostomy infections to evaluate their relationship to monitoring duration and prophylactic catheter exchange. In 1984, the results of an epidemiological study of ventriculostomy-related infection were published. One of the conclusions of the paper was that the incidence of ventriculostomy-related infections rose after 5 days of monitoring. This led to the recommendation that catheters be prophylactically changed at 5-day intervals if prolonged monitoring was required. A recent randomized prospective study on central venous catheters showed no reduction in infection with prophylactic catheter exchanges. This has led the authors to reexamine their experience with ventriculostomy infections. Data on 584 severely head injured patients with ventriculostomies were prospectively collected in two data banks, The Traumatic Coma Data Bank and The Medical College of Virginia Neurocore Data Bank. These data were retrospectively analyzed for factors associated with ventriculostomy related infections. It was found that there is a relationship of ventriculitis to monitoring duration but it is not simple or linear. There is a rising risk of infection over the first 10 days, but infection then becomes very unlikely despite a population that continues to be at risk. Patients in whom catheters were replaced prior to 5 days did not have a lower infection rate than those whose catheters were exchanged at more than 5-day intervals. Based on these data, it is recommended that ventriculostomy catheters for intracranial pressure monitoring be removed as quickly as possible, and in circumstances in which prolonged monitoring is required, there appears to be no benefit from catheter exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Tunkel, A. R., Hasbun, R., Bhimraj, A., Byers, K., Kaplan, S. L., Scheld, W. M., van de Beek, D., Bleck, T. P., Garton, H. J. L., & Zunt, J. R. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw861 · Cited by 1,067
Robba, C., Santori, G., Czosnyka, M., Corradi, F., Bragazzi, N., Padayachy, L., Taccone, F. S., & Citerio, G. (2018) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7 · Cited by 420
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.183689 · Cited by 357
Nosocomial ventriculitis and meningitis in neurocritical care patients
Beer, R., Lackner, P., Pfausler, B., & Schmutzhard, E. (2008) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-008-0059-8 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Holloway, K. L., Barnes, T., Choi, S., Bullock, R., Marshall, L. F., Eisenberg, H. M., Jane, J. A., Ward, J. D., Young, H. F., & Marmarou, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-424
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125301498
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0419
- The paper
- Holloway, K. L., Barnes, T., Choi, S., Bullock, R., Marshall, L. F., Eisenberg, H. M., Jane, J. A., Ward, J. D., Young, H. F., & Marmarou, A. (1996). Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.