The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dose—response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery
Abstract
As the number of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery increases, it becomes particularly important to define with precision adverse effects on distinct structures of the nervous system. Object.This study was designed to assess the dose—response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves after exposure of the cavernous sinus to radiation. Methods.A total of 66 sites in the visual system and 210 cranial nerves of the middle cranial fossa were investigated in 50 patients who had undergone gamma knife treatment for benign skull base tumors. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range 24–60 months). Follow-up examinations consisted of neurological, neuroradiological, and neuroophthalmological evaluations. The actuarial incidence of optic neuropathy was zero for patients who received a radiation dose of less than 10 Gy, 26.7% for patients receiving a dose in the range of 10 to less than 15 Gy, and 77.8% for those who received doses of 15 Gy or more (p < 0.0001). Previously impaired vision improved in 25.8% and was unchanged in 51.5% of patients. No sign of neuropathy was seen in patients whose cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus received radiation doses of between 5 and 30 Gy. Because tumor control appeared to have been achieved in 98% of the patients, the deterioration in visual function cannot be attributed to tumor progression. Conclusions.The structures of the visual pathways (the optic nerve, chiasm, and tract) exhibit a much higher sensitivity to single-fraction radiation than other cranial nerves, and their particular dose—response characteristics can be defined. In contrast, the oculomotor and trigeminal nerves have a much higher dose tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuropathies
Guy, J., Mancuso, A., Quisling, R. G., Beck, R., & Moster, M. (1990) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32537-x · Cited by 90
Cited by
Karavitaki, N., Cudlip, S., Adams, C. B. T., & Wass, J. A. H. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0002 · Cited by 514
A study on the radiation tolerance of the optic nerves and chiasm after stereotactic radiosurgery
Stafford, S. L., Pollock, B. E., Leavitt, J. A., Foote, R. L., Brown, P. D., Link, M. J., Gorman, D. A., & Schomberg, P. J. (2003) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04380-8 · Cited by 355
Prolactin in Human Reproduction
Molitch, M. E. (2009) · Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-4907-4.00003-6 · Cited by 31
Astradsson, A., Munck af Rosenschöld, P., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Poulsgaard, L., Wiencke, A. K., Ohlhues, L., Engelholm, S. A., Broholm, H., Hansen Møller, E., Klose, M., et al. (2017) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2016.1270466 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Leber, K. A., Berglöff, J., & Pendl, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-50
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968386365
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose—response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0043
- The paper
- Leber, K. A., Berglöff, J., & Pendl, G. (1998). Dose—response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.