The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma
Abstract
Object. To explore factors affecting the survival rate in patients with meningiomas, the authors used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), which includes tumors from approximately 1000 hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons tumor registry program. Methods. Analysis included over 9000 cases diagnosed from 1985 to 1988 and 1990 to 1992. Survival estimates were computed and prognostic factors were identified using a proportional hazards model. The overall 5-year survival rate was 69% and it declined with patient age. This rate was 81% in patients aged 21 to 64 years and 56% for patients 65 years of age or older. When patients were grouped by the histological type of their tumors, those with benign tumors had an overall 5-year survival rate of 70%, whereas the overall 5-year survival rates in patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas were 75% and 55%, respectively. Prognostic factors for benign tumors included age at diagnosis, tumor size, whether treated surgically, hospital type, and radiation therapy; for malignant tumors, the prognostic factors included: age at diagnosis, whether treated surgically, and radiation therapy. These factors were statistically significant. The 5-year rate for recurrence of symptoms (regardless of the method of treatment) was 19.2% for those with benign tumors and 32.4% for those with malignant tumors. In patients whose benign tumor had been completely removed, the 5-year rate of tumor recurrence was 20.5%. Conclusions. Although not population-based, the NCDB has the potential for providing pertinent information regarding patient characteristics and methods of treatment for benign, as well as malignant, brain tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ostrom, Q. T., Gittleman, H., Farah, P., Ondracek, A., Chen, Y., Wolinsky, Y., Stroup, N. E., Kruchko, C., & Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S. (2013) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/not151 · Cited by 11,994
Dolecek, T. A., Propp, J. M., Stroup, N. E., & Kruchko, C. (2012) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos218 · Cited by 1,710
Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: Current concepts and review of the literature
Wrensch, M., Minn, Y., Chew, T., Bondy, M., & Berger, M. S. (2002) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/4.4.278 · Cited by 837
Brain tumor survival: Results from the National Cancer Data Base
Surawicz, T. S., Davis, F., Freels, S., Laws, E. R., & Menck, H. R. (1998) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1023/a:1006091608586 · Cited by 345
Self-citationManagement of the patient and family with neurofibromatosis 2: a consensus conference statement
Evans, D., Baser, M., O'Reilly, B., Rowe, J., Gleeson, M., Saeed, S., King, A., Huson, S., Kerr, R., Thomas, N., et al. (2005) · British Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.1080/02688690500081206 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarthy, B. J., Davis, F. G., Freels, S., Surawicz, T. S., Damek, D. M., Grutsch, J., Menck, H. R., & Laws, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 831-839
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163079095
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0831
- The paper
- McCarthy, B. J., Davis, F. G., Freels, S., Surawicz, T. S., Damek, D. M., Grutsch, J., Menck, H. R., & Laws, E. R. (1998). Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.