The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An implantable guide-screw system for brain tumor studies in small animals
Abstract
Object. To overcome the problems associated with using stereotactic techniques to establish intracranial xenografts in nude mice and to treat engrafted tumors with intratumoral therapies (such as gene or viral therapies), the authors developed an implantable guide-screw system. In this study, they describe the guide-screw system, its method of implantation, and their experience with establishing xenografts and delivering intratumoral therapy. Methods. The system consists of a 2.6-mm guide screw with a central 0.5-mm diameter hole that accepts the 26-gauge needle of a Hamilton syringe. The screw is implanted into a small drill hole made 2.5 mm lateral and 1 mm anterior to the bregma. A stylet is used to cap the screw between treatments. Tumor cells or therapeutic agents are injected in a freehand fashion by using a Hamilton syringe and a 26-gauge needle fitted with a cuff to determine the depth of injection. To test this system, guide screws were successfully implanted in 44 (98%) of 45 nude mice. After 1 to 2 weeks of recovery, 38 mice were inoculated with U87MG cells and killed 5 days later. On histological studies in 37 (97%) of these animals, xenografts were evident within the caudate nucleus (mean diameter 2.5 mm). To determine whether injections into the center of an established xenograft could be reproducibly achieved with the guide-screw system, an adenovirus vector containing the β-galactosidase gene was injected 3 days after cell implantation in 15 of the mice. All of these animals demonstrated transduced cells within the tumor. To demonstrate that engrafted animals have a uniform survival time that is indicative of reproducible tumor growth, the survival of six mice was assessed after engraftment with U87MG cells. All six animals died within 28 to 35 days. Conclusions. The guide-screw system allows a large number of animals to be rapidly and reproducibly engrafted and for intratumoral treatments to be accurately delivered into established xenografts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inda, M.-D.-M., Bonavia, R., Mukasa, A., Narita, Y., Sah, D. W. Y., Vandenberg, S., Brennan, C., Johns, T. G., Bachoo, R., Hadwiger, P., et al. (2010) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1890510 · Cited by 543
Barth, R. F., & Kaur, B. (2009) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9875-7 · Cited by 427
Blood-Brain Barrier and Delivery of Protein and Gene Therapeutics to Brain
Pardridge, W. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00373 · Cited by 405
The transcriptional coactivator TAZ regulates mesenchymal differentiation in malignant glioma
Bhat, K. P. L., Salazar, K. L., Balasubramaniyan, V., Wani, K., Heathcock, L., Hollingsworth, F., James, J. D., Gumin, J., Diefes, K. L., Kim, S. H., et al. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.176800.111 · Cited by 377
Self-citationKoh, M. Y., Lemos, R., Liu, X., & Powis, G. (2011) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4142 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Lal, S., Lacroix, M., Tofilon, P., Fuller, G. N., Sawaya, R., & Lang, F. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 326-333
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022957248
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An implantable guide-screw system for brain tumor studies in small animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0326
- The paper
- Lal, S., Lacroix, M., Tofilon, P., Fuller, G. N., Sawaya, R., & Lang, F. F. (2000). An implantable guide-screw system for brain tumor studies in small animals. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.