The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative and postoperative cognitive functioning in patients with frontal meningiomas
Abstract
Object. There is presently no specific information available concerning the nature and course of cognitive deficits caused by intracranial meningiomas. In this prospective study the authors examined the cognitive functioning of patients with frontal meningiomas. Methods. Fifty-four patients with frontal meningiomas were examined neuropsychologically before and after neurosurgery. The test battery consisted of standardized instruments including those assessing memory, attention, visuoconstructive abilities, and executive functions. The time period between pre-and postoperative assessment ranged from 4 to 9 months. The patients' performance was compared with the results in 54 healthy adults who were also assessed twice by using the same test battery in a period ranging from 4 to 9 months. In addition, the effect on cognition of meningioma lateralization, localization, lesion size, edema, brain compression, time course, and the occurrence of preoperative seizures was analyzed. Conclusions. Except in the case of working memory, comparisons of pre- and postoperative assessments of cognition revealed no differences in memory, visuoconstructive abilities, or executive functions, although a postoperative improvement in attentional functions was observed. The results of this study indicate that the surgical removal of frontal meningiomas does not impair patients' cognitive functioning. Furthermore, improvements in attentional functions may occur in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR
Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731 · Cited by 1,426
The Neuropsychology of Attention
Cohen, R. A. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7 · Cited by 332
Verbal and figural fluency in patients with mass lesions of the left or right frontal lobes
Tucha, O., Smely, C., & Lange, K. W. (1999) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/jcen.21.2.229.928 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Cited by
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas
Goldbrunner, R., Minniti, G., Preusser, M., Jenkinson, M. D., Sallabanda, K., Houdart, E., von Deimling, A., Stavrinou, P., Lefranc, F., Lund-Johansen, M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30321-7 · Cited by 854
Cement leakage during vertebroplasty: an underestimated problem?
Schmidt, R., Cakir, B., Mattes, T., Wegener, M., Puhl, W., & Richter, M. (2005) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0839-5 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucha, O., Smely, C., Preier, M., Becker, G., Paul, G. M., & Lange, K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-31
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968411950
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative and postoperative cognitive functioning in patients with frontal meningiomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0021
- The paper
- Tucha, O., Smely, C., Preier, M., Becker, G., Paul, G. M., & Lange, K. W. (2003). Preoperative and postoperative cognitive functioning in patients with frontal meningiomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.