The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience
Abstract
Object. The authors report on their 11 years' experience with embolization of cerebral aneurysms using Guglielmi Detachable Coil (GDC) technology and on the attendant anatomical and clinical outcomes. Methods. Since December 1990, 818 patients harboring 916 aneurysms were treated with GDC embolization at University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center. For comparative purposes, the patients were divided into two groups: Group A included their initial 5 years' experience with 230 patients harboring 251 aneurysms and Group B included the later 6 years' experience with 588 patients harboring 665 aneurysms. Angiographically demonstrated complete occlusion was achieved in 55% of aneurysms and a neck remnant was displayed in 35.4% of lesions. Incomplete embolization was performed in 3.5% of aneurysms, and in 5% occlusion was attempted unsuccessfully. A comparison between the two groups revealed a higher complete embolization rate in patients in Group B compared with that in Group A patients (56.8 and 50.2%, respectively). The overall morbidity/mortality rate was 9.4%. Angiographic follow ups were obtained in 53.4% of cases of aneurysms, and recanalization was exhibited in 26.1% of aneurysms in Group A and 17.2% of those in Group B. The overall recanalization rate was 20.9%. Note that recanalization was related to the size of the dome and neck of the aneurysm. Overall incidence of delayed aneurysm rupture was 1.6%, a rate that improved in the past 5 years to 0.5%. Ten of 12 delayed ruptures occurred in large or giant aneurysms. Conclusions. The clinical and postembolization outcomes in patients treated with the GDC system have improved in the past 5 years. Aneurysm recanalization, however, is still a major limitation of current GDC therapy. Follow-up angiography is mandatory after GDC embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Further technical and device improvements are mandatory to overcome current GDC limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campi, A., Ramzi, N., Molyneux, A. J., Summers, P. E., Kerr, R. S. C., Sneade, M., Yarnold, J. A., Rischmiller, J., & Byrne, J. V. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.106.466987 · Cited by 553
Ferns, S. P., Sprengers, M. E. S., van Rooij, W. J., Rinkel, G. J. E., van Rijn, J. C., Bipat, S., Sluzewski, M., & Majoie, C. B. L. M. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.553099 · Cited by 455
Endovascular Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Experience and Future Advances
Koebbe, C. J., Veznedaroglu, E., Jabbour, P., & Rosenwasser, R. H. (2006) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000237512.10529.58 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Murayama, Y., Nien, Y. L., Duckwiler, G., Gobin, Y. P., Jahan, R., Frazee, J., Martin, N., & Viñuela, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 959-966
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147142748
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959
- The paper
- Murayama, Y., Nien, Y. L., Duckwiler, G., Gobin, Y. P., Jahan, R., Frazee, J., Martin, N., & Viñuela, F. (2003). Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.