The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Volumetric extent of resection and residual contrast enhancement on initial surgery as predictors of outcome in adult patients with hemispheric anaplastic astrocytoma
Abstract
Object: To investigate the prognostic significance of the volumetrically assessed extent of resection on time to tumor progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tumor recurrence patterns, the authors retrospectively analyzed preoperative and postoperative tumor volumes in 102 adult patients from the time of the initial resection of a hemispheric anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). Methods: The quantification of tumor volumes was based on a previously described method involving computerized analysis of magnetic resonance (MR) images. Analysis of contrast-enhancing tumor volumes on T 1-weighted MR images was conducted for 67 patients who had contrast-enhancing tumors. Measurements of T 2 hyperintensity were obtained for all 102 patients in the study. The presence or absence of preresection enhancement, actual volume of this enhancement, and the percentage of preoperative enhancement as it relates to the total T 2 tumor volume did not have a statistically significant relationship to TTP or OS. In addition to age, the volume of residual disease measured on T 2-weighted MR images was the most significant predictor of TTP (p < 0.001), and residual contrast-enhancing tumor volume was the most significant predictor of OS (p = 0.003) on multivariate analysis. In contrast to low-grade gliomas, there was no statistically significant relationship between the extent of resection and histological characteristics at the time of recurrence, that is, tumor Grade III compared with Grade IV. Conclusions: Data from this retrospective analysis of a histologically uniform group of hemispheric AAs treated in the MR imaging era suggest that residual tumor volumes, as documented on postoperative imaging studies, may be a prognostic factor for TTP and OS for this patient population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beiko, J., Suki, D., Hess, K. R., Fox, B. D., Cheung, V., Cabral, M., Shonka, N., Gilbert, M. R., Sawaya, R., Prabhu, S. S., et al. (2014) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/not159 · Cited by 456
Awake craniotomy to maximize glioma resection: methods and technical nuances over a 27-year period
Hervey-Jumper, S. L., Li, J., Lau, D., Molinaro, A. M., Perry, D. W., Meng, L., & Berger, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.10.jns141520 · Cited by 451
Self-citationSanai, N., Polley, M.-Y., & Berger, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2009.6.jns0952 · Cited by 349
Self-citationA new concept of diffuse (low-grade) glioma surgery
Duffau, H. (2012) · Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0676-1_1 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Keles, G. E., Chang, E. F., Lamborn, K. R., Tihan, T., Chang, C.-J., Chang, S. M., & Berger, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-40
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141101504
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volumetric extent of resection and residual contrast enhancement on initial surgery as predictors of outcome in adult patients with hemispheric anaplastic astrocytoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.34
- The paper
- Keles, G. E., Chang, E. F., Lamborn, K. R., Tihan, T., Chang, C.-J., Chang, S. M., & Berger, M. S. (2006). Volumetric extent of resection and residual contrast enhancement on initial surgery as predictors of outcome in adult patients with hemispheric anaplastic astrocytoma. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.