The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
White Matter Abnormalities in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traumatic axonal injury is a primary brain abnormality in head trauma and is characterized by reduction of fractional anisotropy (FA) on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Our hypothesis was that patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) have widespread brain white matter regions of reduced FA involving a variety of fiber bundles and show fiber disruption on fiber tracking in a minority of these regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Twenty-one patients with mild TBI were investigated (men:women, 12:9; mean age +/- SD, 32 +/- 9 years). In a voxel-based comparison with 11 control subjects (men:women, 8:3; mean age, 37 +/- 9 years) using z score analysis, patient regions with abnormally reduced FA were defined in brain white matter. MR imaging, DTI, and fiber tracking characteristics of these regions were described and analyzed using Pearson correlation, linear regression analysis, or the chi(2) test when appropriate. RESULTS: Patients had on average 9.1 regions with reduced FA, with a mean region volume of 525 mm(3), predominantly found in cerebral lobar white matter, cingulum, and corpus callosum. These regions mainly involved supratentorial projection fiber bundles, callosal fibers, and fronto-temporo-occipital association fiber bundles. Internal capsules and infratentorial white matter were relatively infrequently affected. Of all of the involved fiber bundles, 19.3% showed discontinuity on fiber tracking. CONCLUSION: Patients with mild TBI have multiple regions with reduced FA in various white matter locations and involving various fiber bundles. A minority of these fiber bundles show discontinuity on fiber tracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—A technical review.
Beaulieu, C. (2002) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.782 · Cited by 4,628
Cited by
Budde, M. D., Janes, L., Gold, E., Turtzo, L. C., & Frank, J. A. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr161 · Cited by 408
Exploring the convergence of posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury
Stein, M. B., & McAllister, T. W. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101604 · Cited by 391
Cubon, V. A., Putukian, M., Boyer, C., & Dettwiler, A. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1430 · Cited by 297
Chung, S., Wang, X., Fieremans, E., Rath, J. F., Amorapanth, P., Foo, F.-Y. A., Morton, C. J., Novikov, D. S., Flanagan, S. R., & Lui, Y. W. (2019) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6146 · Cited by 31
Understanding individual variability in symptoms and recovery following mTBI: a role for TMS-EEG
Coyle, H. L., Ponsford, J., & Hoy, K. E. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.027 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutgers, D. R., Toulgoat, F., Cazejust, J., Fillard, P., Lasjaunias, P., & Ducreux, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2007-11-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 514-519
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- OpenAlex
- W2143635299
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.