Cited by 91Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Diffusional kurtosis imaging of the developing brain

Open access
Paydar, A., Fieremans, E., Nwankwo, J. I., Lazar, M., Sheth, H. D., Adisetiyo, V., Helpern, J. A., Jensen, J. H. +1 more·2014·American Journal of Neuroradiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusional kurtosis imaging is an extension of DTI but includes non-Gaussian diffusion effects, allowing more comprehensive characterization of microstructural changes during brain development. Our purpose was to use diffusional kurtosis imaging to measure age-related microstructural changes in both the WM and GM of the developing human brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusional kurtosis imaging was performed in 59 subjects ranging from birth to 4 years 7 months of age. Diffusion metrics, fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis were collected from VOIs within multiple WM and GM structures and subsequently analyzed with respect to age. Diffusional kurtosis tractography images at various stages of development were also generated. RESULTS: Fractional anisotropy and mean kurtosis both showed age-related increases in all WM regions, reflecting progression of diffusional anisotropy throughout development, predominantly in the first 2 years of life (eg, 70% and 157% increase in fractional anisotropy and mean kurtosis, respectively, from birth to 2 years for the splenium). However, mean kurtosis detected continued microstructural changes in WM past the fractional anisotropy plateau, accounting for more delayed isotropic changes (eg, 90% of maximum fractional anisotropy was reached at 5 months, whereas 90% of maximum mean kurtosis occurred at 18 months for the external capsule). Mean kurtosis may also provide greater characterization of GM maturation (eg, the putamen showed no change in fractional anisotropy but an 81% change in mean kurtosis from birth to 4 years 7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Mean kurtosis detects significant microstructural changes consistent with known patterns of brain maturation. In comparison with fractional anisotropy, mean kurtosis may offer a more comprehensive evaluation of age-related microstructural changes in both WM and GM and is potentially a valuable technique for studying brain development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3174/ajnr.a3764

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Brody BA, Kinney HC, Kloman AS, et al. Sequence of central nervous system myelination in infancy. I. An autopsy study of myelination. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1987;46:283-301
  2. Kinney HC, Brody BA, Kloman AS, et al. Sequence of central nervous system myelination in human infancy. II. Patterns of myelination in autopsied brains. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1988;47:217-34
  3. Deipolyi AR, Mukherjee P, Gill K, et al. Comparing microstructural and macrostructural development of the cerebral cortex in prema- ture newborns: diffusion tensor imaging versus cortical gyration. Neuroimage 2005;27:579 -86
  4. Takeda K, Nomura Y, Sakuma H, et al. MR assessment of normal brain development in neonates and infants: comparative study of T1-and diffusion-weighted images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:1-7
  5. Basser PJ, Jones DK. Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis: a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15:456 -67
  6. Cheung MM, Hui ES, Chan KC, et al. Does diffusion kurtosis imag- ing lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study. Neuroimage 2009;45:386 -92
  7. Yoshida S, Oishi K, Faria AV, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of nor- mal brain development. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:15-27
  8. Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 1995;8:333-44
  9. Hu ¨ppi PS, Dubois J. Diffusion tensor imaging of brain develop- ment. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;11:489 -97
  10. Schimrigk SK, Bellenberg B, Schluter M. Diffusion tensor imaging- based fractional anisotropy quantification in the corticospinal tract of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using a probabi- listic mixture model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:724 -30
  11. Veraart J, Poot DH, Van Hecke W, et al. More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:138 -45
  12. Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010;23:698 -710
  13. Lu H, Jensen JH, Ramani A, et al. Three-dimensional characteriza- tion of non-Gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed 2006;19:236 -47
  14. Tournier JD, Yeh CH, Calamante F, et al. Resolving crossing fibers using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffu- sion-weighted imaging phantom data. Neuroimage 2008;42:617-25
  15. Perrin M, Poupon C, Cointepas Y, et al. Fiber tracking in Q-ball fields using regularized particle trajectories. Inf Process Med Imaging 2005;19:52-63
  16. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53:1432-40
  17. De Santis S, Gabrielli A, Palombo M, et al. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging: a brief practical review. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29:1410 -16
  18. Tabesh A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA, et al. Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:823-36
  19. Lazar M, Jensen JH, Xuan L, et al. Estimation of the orientation distribution function from diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:774 -81
  20. Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, et al. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999;45:265-69
  21. Provenzale JM, Isaacson J, Chen S. Progression of corpus callosum diffusion-tensor imaging values during a period of signal changes consistent with myelination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198: 1403-08
  22. Sampaio RC and Truwit CL. Myelination of the developing human brain. In: Nelson CA, Luciana M, eds. Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2001:35-44
  23. Mu ¨ller K, Homberg V, Lenard HG. Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and nerve roots in children: maturation of cortico-motoneu- ronal projections. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;81: 63-70
  24. Nezu A, Kimura S, Uehara S, et al. Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in children: maturity of corticospinal pathway and problem of clinical application. Brain Dev 1997;19:176 -80
  25. Hui ES, Cheung MM, Qi L, et al. Toward better MR characterization of neural tissues using directional diffusion kurtosis analysis. Neu- roimage 2008;42:122-34
  26. Gao Y, Zhang Y, Wong CS, et al. Diffusion abnormalities in tempo- ral lobes of children with temporal lobe epilepsy: a preliminary dif- fusional kurtosis imaging study and comparison with diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed 2012;25:1369 -77
  27. Helpern JA, Adisetiyo V, Falangola MF, et al. Preliminary evidence of altered gray and white matter microstructural development in the frontal lobe of adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. J Magn Reson Imag- ing 2011;33:17-23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paydar, A., Fieremans, E., Nwankwo, J. I., Lazar, M., Sheth, H. D., Adisetiyo, V., Helpern, J. A., Jensen, J. H., & Milla, S. S.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2013-11-14
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
808-814
ISSN
  • 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-959X
OpenAlex
W2021404550
Cited by
91
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
diffusion kurtosis imaging, brain development, white matter maturation, mean kurtosis, fractional anisotropy, non-Gaussian diffusion, diffusion tractography, splenium, external capsule, putamen
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Models, Neurological, Retrospective Studies, Anisotropy, Internal Capsule, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter, Gray Matter, External Capsule

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review