The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles reporting the prevalence of imaging findings (CT or MR imaging) in asymptomatic individuals from published English literature through April 2014. Two reviewers evaluated each manuscript. We selected age groupings by decade (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 years), determining age-specific prevalence estimates. For each imaging finding, we fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model for the age-specific prevalence estimate clustering in the study, adjusting for the midpoint of the reported age interval. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles reporting imaging findings for 3110 asymptomatic individuals met our study inclusion criteria. The prevalence of disk degeneration in asymptomatic individuals increased from 37% of 20-year-old individuals to 96% of 80-year-old individuals. Disk bulge prevalence increased from 30% of those 20 years of age to 84% of those 80 years of age. Disk protrusion prevalence increased from 29% of those 20 years of age to 43% of those 80 years of age. The prevalence of annular fissure increased from 19% of those 20 years of age to 29% of those 80 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age. Many imaging-based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain. These imaging findings must be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boden, S. D., McCowin, P. R., Davis, D. O., Dina, T. S., Mark, A. S., & Wiesel, S. (1990) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199072080-00008 · Cited by 2,708
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back Pain
Jensen, M. C., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Obuchowski, N., Modic, M. T., Malkasian, D., & Ross, J. S. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199407143310201 · Cited by 2,402
Boden, S. D., Davis, D. O., Dina, T. S., Patronas, N. J., & Wiesel, S. W. (1990) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199072030-00013 · Cited by 2,115
Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences
Thornton, A. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00161-4 · Cited by 1,291
WIESEL, S. W., TSOURMAS, N., FEFFER, H. L., CITRIN, C. M., & PATRONAS, N. (1984) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198409000-00003 · Cited by 720
Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging
Jarvik, J. G., & Deyo, R. A. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00010 · Cited by 697
Self-citationImaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
Chou, R., Fu, R., Carrino, J. A., & Deyo, R. A. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60172-0 · Cited by 611
Self-citationTeraguchi, M., Yoshimura, N., Hashizume, H., Muraki, S., Yamada, H., Minamide, A., Oka, H., Ishimoto, Y., Nagata, K., Kagotani, R., et al. (2014) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.019 · Cited by 510
Boos, N., Rieder, R., Schade, V., Spratt, K. F., Semmer, N., & Aebi, M. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199512150-00002 · Cited by 505
Weishaupt, D., Zanetti, M., Hodler, J., & Boos, N. (1998) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.209.3.9844656 · Cited by 496
Cited by
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention
Hartvigsen, J., Hancock, M. J., Kongsted, A., Louw, Q., Ferreira, M. L., Genevay, S., Hoy, D., Karppinen, J., Pransky, G., Sieper, J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30480-x · Cited by 4,652
Self-citationMaher, C., Underwood, M., & Buchbinder, R. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30970-9 · Cited by 2,535
Knezevic, N. N., Candido, K. D., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Van Zundert, J., & Cohen, S. P. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9 · Cited by 1,345
Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions
Fitzcharles, M.-A., Cohen, S. P., Clauw, D. J., Littlejohn, G., Usui, C., & Häuser, W. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00392-5 · Cited by 1,253
O’Sullivan, P. B., Caneiro, J. P., O’Keeffe, M., Smith, A., Dankaerts, W., Fersum, K., & O’Sullivan, K. (2018) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy022 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinjikji, W., Luetmer, P. H., Comstock, B., Bresnahan, B. W., Chen, L. E., Deyo, R. A., Halabi, S., Turner, J. A., Avins, A. L., James, K., Wald, J. T., Kallmes, D. F., & Jarvik, J. G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Published
- 2014-11-27
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 811-816
- ISSN
- 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-959X
- OpenAlex
- W2141841210
- Cited by
- 1,250
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3174/ajnr.a4173
- The paper
- Brinjikji, W., Luetmer, P. H., Comstock, B., Bresnahan, B. W., Chen, L. E., Deyo, R. A., Halabi, S., Turner, J. A., Avins, A. L., James, K., Wald, J. T., Kallmes, D. F., & Jarvik, J. G. (2015). Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a4173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.