The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications
Open accessAbstract
The article analyses the agreements concluded by the EU with Japan: Economic Partnership Agreement, Strategic Partnership Agreementand the negotiated agreement: Investment Protection Agreement. EPA liberalizes trade in goods and services. By setting the legal framework for a strategic partnership, SPA facilitates cooperation against common challenges. IPA will regulate standards for investment protection and disputes resolution. The analysis consists: – the content of the Agreements; – socio-economic and political potential of the parties; – EU’s legal powers to negotiate and conclude agreements, and its competence, whether exclusive or shared, to enter into these Agreements; – the importance of Agreements for their parties and for other international actors as well as for regional, trans-regional and global relations. The thesis of the study is the statement that in a world where instability is increasing and security is reduced, the parties are fulfilling their, as real great powers, obligation to bear special responsibility for the implementation of the values represented. The Agreements confirm the community of values on which they are embedded and create conditions for strengthening these values. The study consists of five parts. First we analyse the subject matter of the Agreements , then their actors, and the reasons of concluding them and why. In part IV \we explain the importance of the Agreements for the contracting parties and for the international community, and in part V we concentrate on the Agreements as seen from the external perspective. The conclusions state that the Agreements institutionalise security communitywhere the security and defence policy component is still relatively weak, but is also being developed. The agreements making closer political and economic ties between the UE and Japan open the way to creation of the EU’s security community with “democratic diamonds” in the Asia–Pacific region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a Substantial EU-Japan Partnership
de Prado, C. (2017) · European Foreign Affairs Review · doi:10.54648/eerr2017034 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuźnar, A., & Menkes, J. B.
- Affiliations
- SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kuźnar, Andżelika
- Menkes, Jerzy Brunon
- Venue
- Review of European and Comparative Law
- Published
- 2020-07-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 7-57
- ISSN
- 2545-384X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3039258941
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Review of European and Comparative Law (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Keywords
- EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, EU external competences, EU external relations, trade liberalization, investment protection, investor-state dispute settlement, security and defence policy, EU-Japan relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31743/recl.4839
- The paper
- Kuźnar, A., & Menkes, J. B. (2020). EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications. Review of European and Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4839