Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Żołnierz i służba wojskowa w świetle kościelnych źródeł normatywnych z IV i V wieku

Open access
Hołasek, Andrzej·2015·Vox Patrum

Abstract

At the beginning of the fourth century the legal situation of Christians in the Roman Empire changed dramatically. Thanks to the Emperor Constantine they were no longer persecuted, and their faith became religio licita. From that point onwards the views of Christians on the state began to evolve. It was a long-term process, and happened at a varied pace. One of the aspects of this transformation was the change of Christian attitude to military service. It needs to be said that, from this perspective, the Church legislative sources have not been examined in a great detail. This article aims to take a closer look at several of the sources that include Church regulations relating to military service of the fourth and fifth cen­turies. These include, i.a., Canons of Hippolytus; Letters of St. Basil; Apostolic Constitutions and Canons of the Apostles. In addition, the article discusses the rel­evant contents of synodal and council canons from said period. These regulations show the adaptation of Church legislature to the new circumstances, in which the Roman state stopped being the persecutor and became the protector of Christianity. The analysis of numerous documents confirms that Christians were present in the Roman army already in the third century. Because of the spilling of blood and the pagan rites performed in the army, the Church hierarchs strongly resisted the idea of allowing Christians to serve in the military. Church regulations from the third century strictly forbade enlisting in the army, or continuing military service for those who were newly accepted into the community, for the reasons mentioned above. From other documents, however, we learn that the number of Christians in the army was nonetheless increasing. Many were able to reconcile military service with their conscience. At the beginning of the fourth century emperor Constantine granted Christians religious freedom. He allowed Christian soldiers to abstain from invoking pagan gods while swearing military oath (sacramentum), and to participate in Sunday services. The empire was slowly becoming a Christian state. It is for this reason that in the Church regulations from the fourth and fifth century we find accep­tance for the presence of Christians in the army. Even though killing of an enemy required undertaking penance, it was no longer a reason for excommunication with no possibility of returning to the Christian communion. The Church expected Christian soldiers to be satisfied with their wages alone, and to avoid harming oth­ers through stealing, forced lodging or taking food. The Church in the East no lon­ger considered it wrong to accept gifts for the upkeep of clergy and other faithful from the soldiers who behaved in a correct manner. From the mid-fourth century performing religious services started being treated as separate from performing a layperson’s duties. For this reason the bishops, in both parts of the empire, de­cided that clergy are barred from military service. In the West, those of the faithful who enlisted with the army after being baptised could no longer be consecrated in the future. In the East, the approach was less rigorous, as the case of Nectarius, the Archbishop of Constantinople, shows. By the end of the fourth century, the West adopted very strict rules of public penance for soldiers – the Popes reminded in their letters to the bishops in Spain and Gaul that after performing the public pen­ance, the soldiers were forbidden to return to the army. We should not forget that the change in the attitude of the Church to military service was also affected by the political-military situation of the Empire. During the fourth and fifth centuries its borderlands were persistently harassed by barbar­ian raids, and the Persian border was threatened. Let us also remember that the army was not popular in the Roman society during this period. For these reasons, the shifting position of the Church had to be positively seen by the Empire’s ruling elites. The situation became dramatic at the beginning of the fifth century, when Rome was sacked by barbarians. Developing events caused the clergy to deepen their reflections on the necessity of waging war and killing enemies. Among such clergymen was St. Augustine, in whose writings we may find a justification of the so-called just war. Meanwhile, in the East, the view that wars can be won only with God’s help began to dominate.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This article surveys fourth- and fifth-century normative church sources — the *Canons of Hippolytus*, Basil's canonical letters, the *Apostolic Constitutions*, the *Canons of the Apostles*, and synodal/council canons — to trace how ecclesiastical legislation shifted from forbidding Christian military service to accepting it under conditions of penance. The author argues this evolution proceeded differently in the Eastern and Western provinces of the Empire.

Key findings

  • Third-century regulations were rigorist: the *Traditio Apostolica* (attributed to Hippolytus of Rome) forbade the military oath (*sacramentum*), killing, and public/military office, with excommunication as the sanction. The *Canones Hippolyti* (canons 13–14, dated 336–340) still barred Christians from becoming soldiers unless compelled under threat of death, but introduced a novelty: a soldier who shed blood was excluded from the Eucharist only until completing penance, rather than excommunicated outright.
  • Basil the Great (canon 13 of his letter to Amphilochius, c. 374) treated wartime killing as a deliberate sin ranked alongside poisoning and abortion, yet prescribed only a three-year abstention from communion for soldiers with blood on their hands — a marked softening compared with the *Canones Hippolyti*.
  • The *Constitutiones apostolorum* (Antioch, c. 380) permitted a soldier to be received as a catechumen provided he harmed no one and was content with his pay (citing Luke 3:14), and allowed the Church to accept soldiers' gifts unless they oppressed the poor; the *Canones apostolorum* (canon 83) barred bishops, presbyters, and deacons from simultaneously holding military office.
  • Western councils focused on discipline: Arles (314) canon 3 ordered systematic draft-evaders excluded from communion "in peace"; Nicaea (325) canon 12 imposed three years among penitent hearers plus ten years of penance on those who abandoned the army and then bribed their way back; Roman synods of 385/386 and Toledo (400) canon 8 barred those who enlisted after baptism from the diaconate; Telepte (418) barred them from clergy entirely; Leo the Great (458) held that enlistment after public penance was contrary to Church principles.

Methods

  • A source-based historical study of normative ecclesiastical texts (pseudepigraphic church orders and synodal/council canons) from the fourth and fifth centuries, read against the political and military context of the Roman Empire.
  • The author discusses each document's date, provenance, textual transmission, and manuscript tradition (e.g., the *Canones Hippolyti* surviving only in Arabic; the *Constitutiones apostolorum* compiled from older sources), then compares their provisions on military service.
  • No quantitative data or formal sampling; the analysis is qualitative and comparative, drawing on secondary literature (Harnack, Cadoux, Kreider, Wipszycka, Minois, and others).

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: normative sources expressed an ideal rather than actual practice; regulations of different origin were often compiled into single collections; texts were copied and translated with significant variation; pseudepigraphic attribution to apostles or their disciples obscures authorship and date. The author also notes it is unknown how far the hierarchy assimilated or enforced these rules, and that the sources were poorly known and little absorbed in the West.
  • Evident from the text: the survey is explicitly selective ("wybranych" — selected sources), so it does not claim completeness; several key texts survive only in translation (Arabic for the *Canones Hippolyti*), and the author's reading of some canons (e.g., Arles canon 3 as aimed at the Donatist crisis) is presented as his own interpretation against competing scholarly views.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31743/vp.3568

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 3 Not valid · 38 Not checked · 38 Own results and interpretations

29 more claims

Create a free account to see all 79 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alföldi A., The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome, tłum. H. Mattingly, Oxford 1948
  2. Barnes T.D., Athanasius and Constantius. Theology and Politics in the Constantinian Empire, Cambridge 1993
  3. Barnes T.D., Constantine and Eusebius, Cambridge 1981
  4. Gosselin M., Power of the Pope during the Middle Ages, tłum. M. Kelly, vol. 2, London 1853
  5. Hefele C.J., A History of the Christian Councils to the close of the Council of Nicaea A. D. 325, trans. W.R. Clark, Edynburg 1883
  6. Liebeschuetz J.H.W.G., Barbarians and Bishops. Army, Church, State in the Age of Arcadius and Chrysostom, Oxford 1992
  7. MacMullen R., Soldier and Civilian in Later Roman Empire, Harvard Historical Monographs 52, Cambridge 1963
  8. Watkins O.D., A History of Penance: being a Study of Authorities, vol. 1: The Whole Church to A.D. 450, London 1920

Metadata

Authors
Hołasek, A.
Affiliations
University of Łódź (PL)
Corresponding author
Hołasek, Andrzej
Venue
Vox Patrum
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
63
Pages
353-373
ISSN
  • 0860-9411 (ISSN-L)
  • 2719-3586
OpenAlex
W3097663571
Cited by
1
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
Locations
  • Vox Patrum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Vox Patrum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Christian soldiers, military service, ecclesiastical law, Hippolytus, Basil of Caesarea, Apostolic Constitution, Apostolic Canons, Constantine, Christianization of the Roman Empire, sacramentum, excommunication, 4th century, 5th century, military oath

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Żołnierz i służba wojskowa w świetle kościelnych źródeł normatywnych z IV i V wieku. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31743/vp.3568
The paper
Hołasek, A. (2015). Żołnierz i służba wojskowa w świetle kościelnych źródeł normatywnych z IV i V wieku. Vox Patrum. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.3568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.