Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Superiority of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (Riggs) for Fluorescent-Antibody Technic with a Modification of its Application

Marshall, J. D., Eveland, W. C., Smith, C. W.·1958·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

1) The globulin fractions of antisera representing bacterial, viral, mycotic agents and antiglobulin fractions were labeled with 2 derivatives of fluorescein amine by 3 methods. 2) Fluorescein isothiocyanate was shown to be superior in stability, ease of conjugation, and degree of fluorescence. This direct method of adding the dye to a dilute buffered antiserum eliminates the need for organic reagents which may denature the protein.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3181/00379727-98-24222

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, J. D., Eveland, W. C., & Smith, C. W.
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
1958-08-01
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
898-900
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W2315085743
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
52.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superiority of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (Riggs) for Fluorescent-Antibody Technic with a Modification of its Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3181/00379727-98-24222
The paper
Marshall, J. D., Eveland, W. C., & Smith, C. W. (1958). Superiority of Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (Riggs) for Fluorescent-Antibody Technic with a Modification of its Application. Experimental Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-98-24222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.