Cited by 1Latin American history and cultureAfro-Latin American StudiesHistorical Studies in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eine schwarze Conquista. Ethnische Konflikte, Kontakte und Vermischung in Esmeraldas (Ekuador) im 16. Jahrhundert

Büschges, Christian·1999·Interethnische Beziehungen in der Geschichte Lateinamerikas

Abstract

Eine schwarze Conquista. Ethnische Konflikte, Kontakte und Vermischung in Esmeraldas (Ekuador) im 16. Jahrhundert was published in Interethnische Beziehungen in der Geschichte Lateinamerikas on page 47.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31819/9783954879663-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Büschges, C.
Corresponding author
Büschges, Christian
Venue
Interethnische Beziehungen in der Geschichte Lateinamerikas
Published
1999-12-31
Pages
47-56
OpenAlex
W11648427
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Iberoamericana Vervuert eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
Keywords
ethnic conflict, interethnic contact, racial mixing, conquest of the Americas, Esmeraldas, 16th century, indigenous peoples, Spanish colonialism, interethnic relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review