Nitrification efficiency in biofilters under various bioloading methods for closed-cycle water supply plants
Open accessAbstract
The rapid development of world aquaculture requires the development of modern technological solutions to maintain stable water quality in industrial aquaculture systems. One of the most effective technologies is recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) installations, which allow significantly reducing the cost of natural and energy resources per kilogram of grown products and ensuring full control of chemical and physical parameters of water. One of the most important elements of the RAS is a biological filter. In this work, a study of the functioning of various types of biological filter designs used in RAS was carried out, namely: biofilters with fixed bioloading, biological filters with moving bioloading, and drip biofilters. The influence of hydraulic load, water temperature, biological loading area and the influence of contact time on the efficiency of the nitrification process in the RAS were studied. The ammonia concentration was artificially raised from 1 to 5 mg/l. At the same time, the hydraulic load was increased from 10 to 80 l/min per 1 m2 of the bioloading surface area. The results of the study showed that biological filters with moving bioloading showed the highest water filtration efficiency – 95% at the minimum water velocity and ammonia concentration. It has been found that increasing the surface area of biological loading and optimizing hydraulic loading can significantly improve the quality of biological filtration. The integral efficiency coefficient (ICE) of nitrification in the biofilter with a moving bioloading was 91.25, which is 6.43% higher than the ICE of the biofilter with a fixed bioloading and 11.91% higher than the ICE of the trickling biofilter. The results of scientific research can be used in aquaculture farms to improve the nitrification process in the RAS system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38
- Authors
- Shablii, D. O., Bezuhlyi, M. D., Kukoba, V. V., Shcherbak, O. V., & Hnoievyi, I. V.
- Affiliations
- State Biotechnological University (UA)
- Private Enterprise "Kukoba Volodymyr Vasyliovych", Kyiv region, Ukraine
- Venue
- VETERINARY SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND NATURE MANAGEMENT
- Publisher
- Kharkiv Entomological Society
- Published
- 2026-05-12
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 95
- ISSN
- 2617-8346 (ISSN-L)
- 2663-5542
- OpenAlex
- W7162552587
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- VETERINARY SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND NATURE MANAGEMENT (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- nitrification efficiency, biofilter, recirculating aquaculture system, trickling biofilter, ammonia removal, hydraulic loading rate, contact time, water temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review