Forecasting the growth of Ambystoma mexicanum via artificial neural networks based on water quality parameters in intensive culture systems
Open accessAbstract
Mexico is home to 17 species of the genus Ambystoma. Among them, 15 have some risk category, and the Ambystoma mexicanum is endangered. Different projects are focused on breeding them in aquaculture, where the growth rates of organisms are highly important. In this research, five parameters were selected as input variables: water temperature, pH, ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate nitrogen. These parameters were selected because they affect the growth of the species through their negative effects on the metabolism of the species. A computer model for growth forecasting is subsequently proposed. A backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN) was used to estimate weights via water quality parameters. The model has a hyperbolic-sigmoid transfer function for the hidden layer and a linear transfer function for the output layer. The data from the samples were generated over 90 days, divided into groups, and subjected to different diets. A trial-and-error approach optimized the number of hidden layer nodes and identified seven optimal neuron nodes. Then, autoregressive models were used to forecast individual parameters as the ANN input. The model obtained was able to predict weight within seven days with an error of less than three grams. The simulation results reveal that the ANN model efficiently forecasts the weight in Ambystoma intensive culture.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27
- Authors
- Vera-Cortes, C. A., Carbajal-Hernández, J. J., Morales-Rodríguez, Ú. S., Hernández-Montaño, D., & Hernández-Bautista, I.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
- Publisher
- Malque Publishing
- Published
- 2025-07-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2025020
- ISSN
- 2318-1265 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412902692
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Instituto Politécnico Nacional
- Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado, Instituto Politécnico Nacional
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
- Keywords
- axolotl, growth prediction, artificial neural networks, water quality parameters, intensive aquaculture, backpropagation, water temperature, pH, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, weight prediction, endangered species conservation, autoregressive models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review