Cited by 1Educational Technology and AssessmentEducation and Islamic StudiesEducational Technology and E-Learning

Student Essay Assessment System in Islamic Education: The Use of Conventional Methods and Web-Based Application Assistance

Open access
Supratama, Riky, Nashihin, Husna, Indahsari, Henik Nur, Wahyuni, Dina Auliatil, Dewi Fadilah, Hanura·2025·Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas dan Intelektualitas

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the student essay assessment system in Islamic Religious Education, focusing on the use of conventional methods and web-based application support. A qualitative approach with a comparative study design was employed. Data were collected through interviews with Islamic Education teachers of Grade XI at SMKN Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta, which utilizes the Broexam Unlock examination application. Teachers play a crucial role in enhancing assessment competencies, including preparing test materials, developing scoring rubrics, and conducting manual evaluations. The results indicate that the conventional essay assessment method presents weaknesses, such as requiring considerable time and effort due to manual corrections. Conversely, the use of web-based applications such as Exambro offers greater efficiency in time and workload, as the system automatically generates results after the exam. These findings highlight that technology utilization through web-based applications can serve as a strategic innovation to enhance the effectiveness of Islamic Religious Education assessment systems in the digital era.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31942/pgrs.v13i2.14510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integration of web-based applications in Islamic education assessment systems effectively enhances evaluation efficiency while providing a highly interactive experience for students.

    “This practice is strongly supported by (Rahayu et al., 2023; Supratama et al., 2025), whose research highlights that the integration of web-based applications in Islamic education assessment systems effectively enhances evaluation efficiency while providing a highly interactive experience for students.”
  • Deploying Wordwall as an assessment tool within the IFP ecosystem not only measures cognitive achievement but simultaneously reinforces active participation within the student-centered learning paradigm.

    “Consequently, deploying Wordwall as an assessment tool within the IFP ecosystem not only measures cognitive achievement but simultaneously reinforces active participation within the student-centered learning paradigm (Supratama et al., 2025).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Supratama, R., Nashihin, H., Indahsari, H. N., Wahyuni, D. A., & Dewi Fadilah, H.
Affiliations
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID)
  • Institut Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Temanggung (ID)
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Madani Yogyakarta (ID)
Venue
Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas dan Intelektualitas
Published
2025-12-16
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
159-174
ISSN
  • 2338-6878 (ISSN-L)
  • 2620-3243
OpenAlex
W7117649391
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Jurnal PROGRESS Wahana Kreativitas dan Intelektualitas (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Islamic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
essay scoring, Islamic education, automated grading, rubrics, assessment technology, vocational high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review