Predictors of Self-Reported Antidepressant Adherence
Abstract
The authors' objectives of this research were: (1) to assess levels of selfreported antidepressant adherence and reasons for nonadherence and (2) to investigate determinants of nonadherence. A group of general hospital and community psychiatry practice mood disorder outpatients (n=80) took a self-report questionnaire that assessed beliefs about antidepressants, self-efficacy, and reasons for nonadherence. High levels of adherence were reported: 58 patients (73%) indicated they took their medication as directed more than 80% of the time. Practical issues (e.g., simply forgetting or a change in routine) were the most frequently identified reasons for nonadherence. Patients were more likely to report nonadherence if they experienced a sexual side effect, had lower self-efficacy, were female, and had not completed post-secondary education. Clinicians should be cognizant of this complexity and address not only issues related to medication efficacy and tolerability, but also social mediators and health beliefs when prescribing antidepressants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being female was a factor associated with medication non-adherence in three studies.
“Being female was a factor associated with medication non-adherence [52, 53, 65]”
From Psychotropic medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with major psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
Health care providers would be unable to explain and optimize prescribing pattern, timing, and dose benefit of medication; lack of friendly deal with medication complexity, tolerability, efficacy, and health belief issues were critical factors influencing medication adherence in three studies.
“In three studies, health care providers would be unable to explain and optimize prescribing pattern, timing, and dose benefit of medication. In addition, the lack of friendly deal with medication complexity, tolerability, efficacy, and health belief issues were critical factors influence medication adherence [11, 44, 52].”
From Psychotropic medication non-adherence and its associated factors among patients with major psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Burra, T. A., Chen, E., McIntyre, R. S., Grace, S. L., Blackmore, E. R., & Stewart, D. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University Health Network (CA)
- York University (CA)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 127-134
- ISSN
- 0896-4289 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-4026
- OpenAlex
- W2148964916
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- antidepressant adherence, medication non-adherence, reasons for non-adherence, self-efficacy, health beliefs, sexual side effects, mood disorders, outpatients, predictors of adherence, gender differences, educational attainment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Culture, Depressive Disorder, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Treatment Refusal, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review