Low-income students a caution about using data on pell grant recipients
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tebbs and Turner (2005) and Turner (2014) identify problems with using publicly reported Pell shares to gauge economic diversity, including misalignment of the numerator and denominator and exclusion of students just above the Pell cutoff.
“Tebbs and Turner (2005) andTurner (2014) point out further issues with the use of publicly reported Pell shares as a measure of economic diversity, including misalignment of the numerator and denominator of the Pell share and potential exclusion of students who just miss the Pell cutoff.”
From Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility (2017) · cites this paper as Tebbs and Turner (2005)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Saez, E., Turner, N., & Yagan, D. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23618 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tebbs, J., & Turner, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 34-43
- ISSN
- 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9146
- OpenAlex
- W2100077359
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
- Change The Magazine of Higher Learning
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
- Keywords
- Pell Grant recipients, low-income students, data limitations, college affordability, student aid eligibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
