A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change.
Abstract
(2008). A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development: Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 26-35.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Political conservatives and progressives are divided on their beliefs about climate change.
“Political conservatives and progressives are divided on their beliefs about climate change”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as Dunlap and McCright, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 780
- Authors
- Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Dunlap, Riley E.
- Venue
- Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 0013-9157 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9154
- OpenAlex
- W2162297565
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 79.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- climate change attitudes, partisanship, political ideology, Republican Party, Democratic Party, public opinion, climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
