Cited by 339Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Why Not Procrastinate? Development and Validation of a New Active Procrastination Scale

Choi, Jin Nam, Moran, Sarah V.·2009·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Procrastination has been studied as a dysfunctional, self-effacing behavior that ultimately results in undesirable outcomes. However, A. H. C. Chu and J. N. Choi (2005) found a different form of procrastination (i.e., active procrastination) that leads to desirable outcomes. The construct of active procrastination has a high potential to expand the time management literature and is likely to be adopted by researchers in multiple areas of psychology. To facilitate the research on this new construct and its further integration into the literature, the authors developed and validated a new, expanded measure of active procrastination that reliably assesses its four dimensions. Using this new measure of active procrastination, they further examined its nomological network. The new 16-item measure is a critical step toward further empirical investigation of active procrastination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/socp.149.2.195-212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 339

Authors
Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2009-04
Volume
149
Issue
2
Pages
195-212
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W2083309415
Cited by
339
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
active procrastination, procrastination, scale development, psychometric validation, time management, nomological network, self-regulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Canada, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Reproducibility of Results, Time Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review