Why Not Procrastinate? Development and Validation of a New Active Procrastination Scale
Abstract
Procrastination has been studied as a dysfunctional, self-effacing behavior that ultimately results in undesirable outcomes. However, A. H. C. Chu and J. N. Choi (2005) found a different form of procrastination (i.e., active procrastination) that leads to desirable outcomes. The construct of active procrastination has a high potential to expand the time management literature and is likely to be adopted by researchers in multiple areas of psychology. To facilitate the research on this new construct and its further integration into the literature, the authors developed and validated a new, expanded measure of active procrastination that reliably assesses its four dimensions. Using this new measure of active procrastination, they further examined its nomological network. The new 16-item measure is a critical step toward further empirical investigation of active procrastination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Choi and Moran (2009) conceptualised active procrastination as involving four specific characteristics.
“Choi and Moran (2009) conceptualised active procrastination as involving four specific characteristics.”
From Psychological Well-Being and Its Relationships with Active and Passive Procrastination (2015) · cites this paper as Choi and Moran (2009)
Procrastination was measured using a 4-item scale developed by Choi and Moran (2009).
“A 4-item scale developed by Choi and Moran (2009) was used to measure procrastination.”
From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Choi and Moran (2009)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 339
- Authors
- Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Choi, Jin Nam
- Venue
- The Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-212
- ISSN
- 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1183
- OpenAlex
- W2083309415
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Keywords
- active procrastination, procrastination, scale development, psychometric validation, time management, nomological network, self-regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Canada, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Reproducibility of Results, Time Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review