Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Japan

Open access
Ohnishi, Makoto, Saika, Takeshi, Hoshina, Shinji, Iwasaku, Kazuhiro, Nakayama, Shu-ichi, Watanabe, Haruo, Kitawaki, Jo·2011·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To the Editor: Spread of multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major public health concern.Effective antimicrobial therapy is a key element in gonorrhea control.However, N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobial drugs, including β-lactams, tetracyclines, and fl uoroquinolones (1-3).Even an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin-resistant, cefi ximeresistant N. gonorrhoeae has emerged, and cefi xime has now been withdrawn from use in Japan.Best practice treatment is limited to injectable extended-spectrum cephalosporins, such as ceftriaxone and spectinomycin.The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae threatens effective disease control.We identifi ed a novel ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolated from a 31-year-old female commercial sex worker; MIC of ceftriaxone for this isolate was high (2 μg/mL).The woman visited a clinic in Kyoto for a routine examination for sexually transmitted infections in January 2009.Although she had no obvious symptoms or signs, a throat sample collected on her fi rst visit yielded a positive result for N. gonorrhoeae by the strand displacement amplifi cation test (ProbeTec ET, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), but a vaginal sample taken at the same time was negative.After 2 weeks, another throat sample was positive for N. gonorrhoeae when cultured on Thayer-Martin medium, and the patient subsequently received 1 g ceftriaxone intravenously.Her pharyngeal sample was also N. gonorrhoeae positive by strand displacement amplifi cation test on the third visit 2 weeks later, and further ceftriaxone treatment was prescribed.However, a culture for test of cure was not conducted because reinfection was

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1701.100397

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Ohnishi, M., Saika, T., Hoshina, S., Iwasaku, K., Nakayama, S.-I., Watanabe, H., & Kitawaki, J.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2011-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
148-149
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W1991803631
Cited by
236
References
0
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid1701.100397
The paper
Ohnishi, M., Saika, T., Hoshina, S., Iwasaku, K., Nakayama, S.-I., Watanabe, H., & Kitawaki, J. (2011). Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Japan. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.100397

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.