Generating Instruction Automatically for the Reading Strategy of Self-Questioning
Abstract
Self-questioning is an important reading comprehension strategy, so it would be useful for an intelligent tutor to help students apply it to any given text. Our goal is to help children generate questions that make them think about the text in ways that improve their comprehension and retention. However, teaching and scaffolding self-questioning involve analyzing both the text and the students' responses. This requirement poses a tricky challenge to generating such instruction automatically, especially for children too young to respond by typing. This paper describes how to generate self-questioning instruction for an automated reading tutor. Following expert pedagogy, we decompose strategy instruction into describing, modeling, scaffolding, and prompting the strategy. We present a working example to illustrate how we generate each of these four phases of instruction for a given text. We identify some relevant criteria and use them to evaluate the generated instruction on a corpus of 513 children's stories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AQG has been widely tried in educational settings.
“AQG has been widely experimented with, in educational settings.”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Jack, M., & Wei, C.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 465-472
- ISSN
- 0922-6389 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W19665345
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- self-questioning, reading comprehension strategies, intelligent tutoring systems, children's reading, scaffolding, prompting, modeling instruction, children's stories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review