Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorders
Abstract
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common anxiety disorder characterized by 6 months of "excessive anxiety and worry" about a variety of events and situations. Anxiety and worry are often accompanied by additional symptoms like restlessness, being easily fatigued, difficulty concentrating, irritability, muscle tension and disturbed sleep. GAD is usually treated with medications and/or psychotherapy. In particular, the two most promising treatments seem to be cognitive therapy and applied relaxation. In this study we integrated these approaches through the use of a biofeedback enhanced virtual reality (VR) system used both for relaxation and controlled exposure. Moreover, this experience is strengthened by the use of a mobile phone that allows patients to perform the virtual experience even in an outpatient setting. This paper describe the results of a controlled trial (NCT00602212) involving 20 GAD patients randomly assigned to the following groups: (1) the VR and Mobile group (VRMB) including biofeedback; (2) the VR and Mobile group (VRM) without biofeedback; (3) the waiting list (WL) group. The clinical data underlined that (a) VR can be used also in the treatment of GAD; (b) in a VR treatment, patients take advantage of a mobile device that delivers in an outpatient setting guided experiences, similar to the one experienced in VR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three of the four studies that examined predominately self-help interventions found EMI to significantly reduce anxiety or stress relative to controls.
“Similarly, three of the four studies that examined predominately self-help interventions found EMI to significantly reduce anxiety or stress relative to controls. 32–34”
From Effectiveness of mobile technologies delivering Ecological Momentary Interventions for stress and anxiety: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
In the present review, only two studies examined the effects of the individual features of mobile technologies that delivered EMIs for anxiety.
“In the present review, only two studies examined the effects of the individual features of mobile technologies that delivered EMIs for anxiety. 32,33”
From Effectiveness of mobile technologies delivering Ecological Momentary Interventions for stress and anxiety: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 7 · Cited by 107
- Authors
- Alessandra, G., Federica, P., Davide, A., Claudia, R., Andrea, G., & Giuseppe, R.
- Venue
- Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 154
- Pages
- 39-43
- ISSN
- 0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W162908134
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, virtual reality, biofeedback, applied relaxation, cognitive therapy, controlled exposure, mobile devices, outpatient care, anxiety treatment
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Biofeedback, Psychology, Humans, User-Computer Interface, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review