Cited by 53Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningLogic, programming, and type systems

Bias reformulation for one-shot function induction

Open access
Lin Dianhuan, Dechter Eyal, Ellis Kevin, Tenenbaum Joshua, Muggleton Stephen·2014·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Abstract

In recent years predicate invention has been underexplored as a bias reformulation mechanism within Inductive Logic Programming due to difficulties in formulating efficient search mechanisms. However, recent papers on a new approach called Meta-Interpretive Learning have demonstrated that both predicate invention and learning recursive predicates can be efficiently implemented for various fragments of definite clause logic using a form of abduction within a meta-interpreter. This paper explores the effect of bias reformulation produced by Meta-Interpretive Learning on a series of Program Induction tasks involving string transformations. These tasks have real-world applications in the use of spreadsheet technology. The existing implementation of program induction in Microsoft's FlashFill (part of Excel 2013) already has strong performance on this problem, and performs one-shot learning, in which a simple transformation program is generated from a single example instance and applied to the remainder of the column in a spreadsheet. However, no existing technique has been demonstrated to improve learning performance over a series of tasks in the way humans do. In this paper we show how a functional variant of the recently developed MetagolDsystem can be applied to this task. In experiments we study a regime of layered bias reformulation in which size-bounds of hypotheses are successively relaxed in each layer and learned programs re-use invented predicates from previous layers. R…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-525

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MIL supports efficient predicate invention and learning of recursive logic programs built as a set of metalogical substitutions by a modified Prolog meta-interpreter.

    “MIL (Muggleton and Lin 2013; Muggleton et al. 2014; Lin et al. 2014) is a technique which supports efficient predicate invention and learning of recursive logic programs built as a set of metalogical substitutions by a modified Prolog meta-interpreter (see Fig. 2) which acts as the central part of the ILP learning engine.”
  • The use of a non-greedy complete search for each episode leads to search time increasing exponentially in the maximum number of clauses considered.

    “This provides an interesting topic for further work since the use of a non-greedy complete search for each episode leads to search time increasing exponentially in the maximum number of clauses considered [see search bound in Lin et al. (2014)].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 53

Authors
Dianhuan, L., Eyal, D., Kevin, E., Joshua, T., & Stephen, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2014
ISSN
0922-6389 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2403468034
Cited by
53
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
9.24
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
Keywords
predicate invention, program induction, one-shot learning, spreadsheet automation, string transformation, layered learning, abduction, inductive logic programming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review