Cited by 166Usability and User Interface DesignElectronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Participatory Design, User Involvement and Health IT Evaluation

Open access
Kushniruk Andre, Nøhr Christian·2016·Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Abstract

End user involvement and input into the design and evaluation of information systems has been recognized as being a critical success factor in the adoption of information systems. Nowhere is this need more critical than in the design of health information systems. Consistent with evidence from the general software engineering literature, the degree of user input into design of complex systems has been identified as one of the most important factors in the success or failure of complex information systems. The participatory approach goes beyond user-centered design and co-operative design approaches to include end users as more active participants in design ideas and decision making. Proponents of participatory approaches argue for greater end user participation in both design and evaluative processes. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of increased user involvement in design is explored in this contribution in the context of health IT. The contribution will discuss several approaches to including users in design and evaluation. Challenges in IT evaluation during participatory design will be described and explored along with several case studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/978-1-61499-635-4-139

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 166

Authors
Andre, K., & Christian, N.
Venue
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2016
Volume
222
Pages
139-51
ISSN
0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2401682204
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
36.21
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
participatory design, user participation, health information systems, end-user involvement, user-centered design, information systems adoption
MeSH terms
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Software Design, User-Computer Interface, Electronic Health Records, Health Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review