Current Trends in Electronic Medication Reminders for Self Care
Abstract
Poor adherence to medication can lead to negative health outcomes and increased financial burdens. We present a literature review on electronic medication reminders used for medication adherence in self care settings, to identify current and possible future trends. A structured PubMed search based on extracted MeSH terms provided a total of 45 publications which were identified as most relevant. Three main categories of electronic solutions were identified: mobile phone reminders, in-home electronic reminder devices, and portable reminder devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor medication adherence can put a financial burden on the healthcare system.
“Poor medication adherence can also put a financial burden on the healthcare system.2”
Existing medication adherence interventions in self-care settings require caregiver involvement, which is often disadvantaged by high-resource delivery needs and mostly impractical for everyday clinical practice settings.
“Existing medication adherence interventions in self-care settings require caregiver involvement, which is often disadvantaged by high-resource delivery needs and mostly impractical for everyday clinical practice settings.2 14”
In-home reminder systems such as automatic pill dispensers ensure that accidental overdose is avoided.
“This kind of reminder system does not only remind the patient to take the medication, but also ensures that accidental overdose is avoided.2”
Poor, inconsistent and interrupted adherence behaviour leads to negative consequences on care, especially for patients with serious health conditions and elderly patients.
“The poor, inconsistent and interrupted adherence behaviour has been shown to lead to negative consequences on care, especially for patients with serious health conditions and elderly patients.2”
In the last two decades, advances have been taken to support medication adherence among older adults through different eHealth interventions.
“Consequently, in the last two decades, advances have been taken to support medication adherence among older adults through different eHealth interventions.2 15”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shin, J., Jang, J., & Afaya, A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060590 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fang Kerry, Y., Maeder Anthony, J., & Heidi, B.
- Venue
- Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 231
- Pages
- 31-41
- ISSN
- 0926-9630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2539492625
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in health technology and informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- medication adherence, self-care, mobile phone reminders
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Self Care, Reminder Systems, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review