Behavioral constituents of chronic pain acceptance: Results from factor analysis of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Abstract
Clinical experience and research show that patients with chronic pain who have a more accepting attitude about their pain experience less distress and function better as compared to those with chronic pain who do not have this attitude. Because this idea has only recently received some empirical sc rutiny, the meaning of acceptance and methods for assessing it in relation to chronic pain have not been firmly established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the behavioral components underlying acceptance of chronic pain. Responses to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire from 230 persons seeking treatment for chronic pain were submitted for principal components analysis with oblique rotation. Based on percent variance, interpretability, and the scree test, four factors were extracted, accounting for 53% included (1) engaging in normal life activities, (2) believing that controlling thoughts controls pain, (3) recognizing that pain may not change, and (4) needing to avoid or control pain. Based on analysis of item summary scores, Factor 2, the “cognitive control” factor, showed the smallest corrected factor-total correlation, suggesting that it may not be an important facet of acceptance. Studies of acceptance of pain have shown that it has potentially high utility for understanding the process of adjustment to chronic pain, however, continued study of this complex attitude is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low levels of pain acceptance predict poorer responses to rehabilitation programs.
“Low levels of pain acceptance predict poorer responses to rehabilitation programs.”
From Telehealth Versus In-Person Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- McCracken, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCracken, Lance M.
- ORCID
- McCracken, Lance M.
- Venue
- Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 93-100
- ISSN
- 1053-8127 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-6324
- OpenAlex
- W1197804470
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain acceptance, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, cognitive control, factor structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review