Cited by 3

Bridging the Gap: Generating a Comprehensive Biomedical Knowledge Graph Question Answering Dataset

Yan, Xi, Westphal, Patrick, Seliger, Jan, Usbeck, Ricardo·2024·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Abstract

Despite the plethora of resources such as large-scale corpora and manually curated Knowledge Graphs (KGs), the ability to perform reasoning with natural language inputs over biomedical graphs remains challenging due to insufficient training data. We propose a novel method for automatically constructing a Biomedical Knowledge Graph Question Answering (BioKGQA) dataset sourced from PrimeKG, the largest precision medicine-oriented KG. In total, we create 85,368 question-answer pairs along with their respective SPARQL queries. Our approach generates a diverse array of contextually relevant questions covering a wide spectrum of biomedical concepts and levels of complexity. We evaluate our method based on automatic metrics alongside manual annotations. We establish novel standards tailored for KGQA systems to highlight the linguistic correctness and semantical faithfulness of the generated questions based on extracted KG facts. The compiled dataset – PrimeKGQA – serves as a valuable benchmarking resource for advancing knowledge-driven biomedical research and evaluating KGQA systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/faia240615

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BioKGQA features 85,368 QA pairs generated using multi-noded triples from PrimeKG.

    “We also considered the BioKGQA dataset, proposed by Yan et al. (2024), which features 85,368 QA pairs generated using multi-noded triples from PrimeKG, a comprehensive KG oriented toward precision medicine.”

    From YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering (2025) · cites this paper as Yan et al., 2024

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, X., Westphal, P., Seliger, J., & Usbeck, R.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2024-10-16
ISSN
  • 0922-6389
  • 1879-8314
Cited by
3
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review