The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Full Traceability and Provenance for Knowledge Graphs
Abstract
Knowledge graphs (KGs) continue spreading into industrial use cases due to their advantages and superiority over classical data representations. A problem that has not yet adequately been solved for KGs is the traceability and provenance of changes, which can be required in an enterprise or by regulations. KGs typically contain the current snapshot of data valid at a certain moment in time only. Changes over time are usually not recorded and no change history exists. The lack of suitable and scalable traceability solutions hinders the wider application of KGs. This paper presents a traceability and provenance solution for KGs, which can track all changes of a KG on triple level. It comprises a provenance engine that intercepts SPARQL/Update queries; PROV-STAR, an RDF-star enabled light-weight extension of the Provenance Ontology (PROV-O) for representing changes and their provenance; and a SPARQL query transformation approach for tracking the changes on a separate provenance KG with SPARQL-star queries. The solution supports full traceability of all changes, on the lowest possible level of triples, with each change being comprehended with detailed provenance information. From the provenance KG a detailed change history can be retrieved, and any past version of the KG can be restored with a single query. The implementation and validation have shown that changes can be tracked at runtime during the normal operation of a KG. Furthermore, the solution is scalable to large KGs and frequent updates, as only the delta of each change is stored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
How to time-stamp a digital document
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196791 · Cited by 1,483
A survey of data provenance in e-science
Simmhan, Y. L., Plale, B., & Gannon, D. (2005) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/1084805.1084812 · Cited by 1,153
Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities
Davidson, S. B., & Freire, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376772 · Cited by 468
The provenance of electronic data
Moreau, L., Groth, P., Miles, S., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Ibbotson, J., Jiang, S., Munroe, S., RANA, O. F., Schreiber, A., Tan, V., et al. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1330311.1330323 · Cited by 224
Knowledge Graphs: Methodology, Tools and Selected Use Cases
Fensel, D., Şimşek, U., Angele, K., Huaman, E., Kärle, E., Panasiuk, O., Toma, I., Umbrich, J., & Wahler, A. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6 · Cited by 205
Tracking RDF Graph Provenance using RDF Molecules
Ding, L., Peng, Y. F., da Silva, P. P., & McGuinness, D. L. (2005) · Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) · doi:10.13016/m2j38kn3p · Cited by 93
Sikos, L. F., & Philp, D. (2020) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-020-00118-0 · Cited by 60
Named Graphs as a Mechanism for Reasoning About Provenance
Watkins, E. R., & Nicole, D. A. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11610113_99 · Cited by 33
Benchmarking RDF Metadata Representations: Reification, Singleton Property and RDF
Orlandi, F., Graux, D., & O’Sullivan, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc50631.2021.00049 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Dibowski, H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2024-12-11
- ISSN
- 0922-6389
- 1879-8314
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 15
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full Traceability and Provenance for Knowledge Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/faia241309
- The paper
- Dibowski, H. (2024). Full Traceability and Provenance for Knowledge Graphs. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. https://doi.org/10.3233/faia241309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.