Cited by 8Semantic Web and OntologiesAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic Modeling

Open Research Knowledge Graph: A Large-Scale Neuro-Symbolic Knowledge Organization System

Open access
Auer, Sören, D’Souza, Jennifer, Farfar, Kheir Eddine, Jaradeh, Mohamad Yaser, Jiomekong, Azanzi, Karras, Oliver, Oelen, Allard, Snyder, Lauren +2 more·2025·Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Abstract

This article presents the implementation of a neuro-symbolic system within the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), a platform designed to collect and organize scientific knowledge in a structured, machine-readable format. Our approach leverages the strengths of symbolic knowledge representation to encode complex relationships and domain-specific rules, combined with the pattern recognition capabilities of neural networks to process large volumes of unstructured data, in particular scientific articles in the form of narrative text documents. With the ORKG, we developed a hybrid system that integrates a knowledge graph (symbolic system) with neural networks (subsymbolic system), enabling the machine-assisted extraction of scientific knowledge from research papers and symbolic knowledge representation, curation, organisation, and reuse. The implementation involves constructing a symbolic knowledge representation of the ORKG, training neural models on annotated datasets, and designing algorithms to synergize the two systems. Our findings suggest that neuro-symbolic integration enhances the ORKG’s ability to support complex queries, infer new relationships, and provide more robust and explainable AI-driven insights. This research contributes to the broader field of AI by showcasing the practical benefits of combining neural and symbolic methodologies in knowledge management systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/faia250216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auer, S., D’Souza, J., Farfar, K. E., Jaradeh, M. Y., Jiomekong, A., Karras, O., Oelen, A., Snyder, L., Stocker, M., & Vogt, L.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) (DE)
  • Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
Venue
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2025-03-17
ISSN
  • 0922-6389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-8314
OpenAlex
W4408633804
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5
FWCI
16.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
neuro-symbolic AI, knowledge graphs, Open Research Knowledge Graph, knowledge representation, knowledge curation, knowledge management systems, relationship inference, explainable AI, scientific knowledge organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review