A new perspective on optimizers: leveraging Moreau-Yosida approximation in gradient-based learning
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) heavily relies on optimization techniques built upon gradient descent. Numerous gradient-based update methods have been proposed in the scientific literature, particularly in the context of neural networks, and have gained widespread adoption as optimizers in ML software libraries. This paper introduces a novel perspective by framing gradient-based update strategies using the Moreau-Yosida (MY) approximation of the loss function. Leveraging a first-order Taylor expansion, we demonstrate the concrete exploitability of the MY approximation to generalize the model update process. This enables the evaluation and comparison of regularization properties underlying popular optimizers like gradient descent with momentum, ADAGRAD, RMSprop, and ADAM. The MY-based unifying view opens up possibilities for designing new update schemes with customizable regularization properties. To illustrate this potential, we propose a case study that redefines the concept of closeness in the parameter space using network outputs. We present a proof-of-concept experimental procedure, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in continual learning scenarios. Specifically, we employ the well-known permuted MNIST dataset, a progressively-permuted MNIST and CIFAR-10 benchmarks, and a non i.i.d. stream. Additionally, we validate the update scheme’s efficacy in an offline-learning scenario. By embracing the MY-based unifying view, we pave the way for advancements in optimization techniques for machine learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Moreau-Yosida approximation of the loss function provides a concrete way to write down popular optimizers (including SGD with momentum, RMSProp and Adam) as a sequence of optimization problems.
“the latter work provides a concrete way to write down popular optimizers (including SGD with momentum, RMSProp and Adam) as a sequence of optimization problems.”
From How Memory in Optimization Algorithms Implicitly Modifies the Loss (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Memory in Optimization Algorithms Implicitly Modifies the Loss
Cattaneo, M., & Shigida, B. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-5215
- Authors
- Betti, A., Ciravegna, G., Gori, M., Melacci, S., Mottin, K., & Precioso, F.
- Affiliations
- IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- University of Siena (IT)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, CNRS, Laboratoire I3S, Maasai team, Nice, France
- Corresponding author
- Betti, Alessandro
- Venue
- Intelligenza Artificiale: The international journal of the AIxIA
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-08-27
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-311
- ISSN
- 1724-8035 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-0097
- OpenAlex
- W4402045213
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligenza Artificiale (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- Moreau-Yosida regularization, gradient-based optimization, neural network optimizers, gradient descent with momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp, Adam, first-order Taylor expansion, continual learning, non-IID data, offline learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review