Cited by 1Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNeural Networks and Applications

A new perspective on optimizers: leveraging Moreau-Yosida approximation in gradient-based learning

Betti, Alessandro, Ciravegna, Gabriele, Gori, Marco, Melacci, Stefano, Mottin, Kevin, Precioso, Frédéric·2024·Intelligenza Artificiale: The international journal of the AIxIA

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) heavily relies on optimization techniques built upon gradient descent. Numerous gradient-based update methods have been proposed in the scientific literature, particularly in the context of neural networks, and have gained widespread adoption as optimizers in ML software libraries. This paper introduces a novel perspective by framing gradient-based update strategies using the Moreau-Yosida (MY) approximation of the loss function. Leveraging a first-order Taylor expansion, we demonstrate the concrete exploitability of the MY approximation to generalize the model update process. This enables the evaluation and comparison of regularization properties underlying popular optimizers like gradient descent with momentum, ADAGRAD, RMSprop, and ADAM. The MY-based unifying view opens up possibilities for designing new update schemes with customizable regularization properties. To illustrate this potential, we propose a case study that redefines the concept of closeness in the parameter space using network outputs. We present a proof-of-concept experimental procedure, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in continual learning scenarios. Specifically, we employ the well-known permuted MNIST dataset, a progressively-permuted MNIST and CIFAR-10 benchmarks, and a non i.i.d. stream. Additionally, we validate the update scheme’s efficacy in an offline-learning scenario. By embracing the MY-based unifying view, we pave the way for advancements in optimization techniques for machine learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/ia-240047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Moreau-Yosida approximation of the loss function provides a concrete way to write down popular optimizers (including SGD with momentum, RMSProp and Adam) as a sequence of optimization problems.

    “the latter work provides a concrete way to write down popular optimizers (including SGD with momentum, RMSProp and Adam) as a sequence of optimization problems.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Betti, A., Ciravegna, G., Gori, M., Melacci, S., Mottin, K., & Precioso, F.
Affiliations
  • IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, CNRS, Laboratoire I3S, Maasai team, Nice, France
Corresponding author
Betti, Alessandro
Venue
Intelligenza Artificiale: The international journal of the AIxIA
Published
2024-08-27
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
301-311
ISSN
  • 1724-8035 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-0097
OpenAlex
W4402045213
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intelligenza Artificiale (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
Moreau-Yosida regularization, gradient-based optimization, neural network optimizers, gradient descent with momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp, Adam, first-order Taylor expansion, continual learning, non-IID data, offline learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review