Cited by 35Muscle activation and electromyography studiesSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Upper body muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance exercise in the bench press

Schoenfeld, Brad J., Contreras, Bret, Vigotsky, Andrew D., Ogborn, Dan, Fontana, Fabio, Tiryaki-Sonmez, Gul·2016·Isokinetics and Exercise Science

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare activation of the upper body musculature during the barbell bench press at varying training intensities. METHODS: Twelve young, resistance-trained men performed sets of the bench press to momentary muscular failure with two different loads: a high-load(HIGH) set at 80% of 1RM and a low-load (LOW) set at 50% 1RM. Exercise order was counterbalanced so that half the subjects performed the LOW condition first and the other half performed the HIGH first. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess mean, peak, and iEMG muscle activation of the anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, and sternal and clavicular heads of the pectoralis major. RESULTS: The main effects for trials were significant for mean EMG (p < 0.001) and iEMG matched (p < 0.001) favoring HIGH and iEMG total favoring LOW(p = 0.001) across all muscle groups in both conditions with varying effect sizes. All other main effects and interactions were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite similarities in peak EMG amplitude, the greater results for mean and iEMG matched in HIGH suggests that heavier loads may produce greater muscle activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/ies-160620

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenfeld, B. J., Contreras, B., Vigotsky, A. D., Ogborn, D., Fontana, F., & Tiryaki-Sonmez, G.
Affiliations
  • Lehman College (US)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
  • Department of Health Sciences, Program of Exercise Science, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA
Corresponding author
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Venue
Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Published
2016-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
217-224
ISSN
  • 0959-3020 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5913
OpenAlex
W2475029813
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Isokinetics and Exercise Science (publishedVersion)
  • UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
bench press, muscle activation, upper body muscles, anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, pectoralis major, exercise order, surface electromyography, integrated EMG

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review