Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making

Ye, Jun·2014·Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

An interval neutrosophic set is an instance of a neutrosophic set, which can be used in real scientific and engineering applications. In the paper, the Hamming and Euclidean distances between interval neutrosophic sets (INSs) are defined and the similarity measures between INSs are proposed based on the relationship between similarity measures and distances. In the applications of the similarity measures, a multicriteria decision-making method is established in interval neutrosophic setting, in which criterion values with respect to alternatives are evaluated by the form of interval neutrosophic values (INVs) and the criterion weights are known information. We utilize the similarity measures between each alternative and the ideal alternative to rank the alternatives and to determine the best one. Finally, an illustrative example demonstrates the applications of the proposed decision-making method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/ifs-120724

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Metadata

Authors
Ye, J.
Venue
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
Published
2014-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
165-172
ISSN
  • 1064-1246 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8967
OpenAlex
W1792561248
Cited by
421
References
11
FWCI
66.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/ifs-120724
The paper
Ye, J. (2014). Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-120724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.