The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Smart government, citizen participation and open data
Open accessAbstract
The use of Information Technologies in government (or e-government) has evolved during the last few years to make the interactions between government and citizens (G2C), government and businesses (G2B), and inter-agency relationships (G2G) more effective, democratic and transparent [1,6,8]. Moreover, in the most recent years we have observed two important trends with an impact in all these interactions. On the one hand, governments around the world have engaged in a movement to open data with open licenses and in easier to re-use formats. On the other hand, technology ubiquity is contributing to the production of impressive amounts of data that have the potential to help us better understand complex social problems as well as to improve government relationships with citizens, private organizations, NGOs and other governments. Both trends together with a more extensive use of information technologies have been referred to as smart government or intelligent government. Smart government is considered as one of the key trends that governments have to follow for the next 10–15 years [7]. The concept of a smart community refers to the use of information and communication technologies by local governments and cities to better interact with their citizens, taking advantage of all available data to solve important problems [2]. However, in order to deliver the expected values, governments need not only to create new services to their citizens based on these technologies in order to improve their quality of life, but also to engage citizens in this new set of services. Hence, there are two main components to be considered: the extensive use of technology by governments, which we refer to as smart government, and the extensive use of technology by citizens to interact with governments, which we will refer to as citizens’ engagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170067 · Cited by 466
Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946 · Cited by 378
Granier, B., & Kudo, H. (2016) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-150367 · Cited by 266
How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government
Schedler, K., Guenduez, A. A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-180095 · Cited by 96
Quantified street: Smart governance of urban safety
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170422 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Information Polity
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-06-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1,2
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 1570-1255 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8754
- OpenAlex
- W1565939565
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart government, citizen participation and open data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/ip-140334
- The paper
- Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Information Polity. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-140334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.