Cited by 45E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Why don't they listen to us? Reasserting the role of ICT in Public Administration

Meijer, Albert·2007·Information Polity

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/ip-2007-0127

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 45

Metadata

Authors
Meijer, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Meijer, Albert
Venue
Information Polity
Published
2007-12-28
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
233-242
ISSN
  • 1570-1255 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8754
OpenAlex
W1601964656
Cited by
45
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Polity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
information and communication technologies, public administration, e-government, citizen participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review