The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Look at the Roles of Look & Roles in Embodied Pedagogical Agents – A User Preference Perspective
Abstract
. The paper presents a theoretical framework addressing three aspects of embodied pedagogical agents: visual static appearance, pedagogical role, and communicative style. The framework is then applied to a user study where 90 school children (age 12 15) in a dummy multimedia program were presented with either an instructor or a learning companion condition. They were then to choose between eight visually different embodied pedagogical agents: four more naturalistic (detailed & 3D-rendered) and four more stylized (simplified & cartoonish). Finally the participants were to choose between a strictly task-oriented versus a task- and relation-oriented pedagogical agent. The goal of the study was to explore possible relations between the three aspects mentioned above with respect to user preferences. Results were: (i) When the agent was introduced as a learning companion, female students displayed a significant tendency to choose a more stylized visual character, (ii) When the agent was introduced as a learning companion, female students displayed a significant tendency to choose a task- and relation-oriented agent, (iii) In the case when students had chosen a more stylized character, there was a significant tendency to choose a task- and relational-oriented agent. The paper also discusses limitations and strengths of the study, and advocates careful descriptions in studies of this kind – especially regarding the notion of visual realism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841
Kuhail, M. A., Thomas, J., Alramlawi, S., Shah, S. J. H., & Thornquist, E. (2022) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics9040081 · Cited by 59
Automatic Deictic Gestures for Animated Pedagogical Agents
Kappagantula, S. R. K., Adamo-Villani, N., Wu, M.-L., & Popescu, V. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2019.2922134 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Haake, M., & Gulz, A.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- IOS Press
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-71
- ISSN
- 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
- 1560-4306
- OpenAlex
- W4413847327
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- user preferences, visual appearance, pedagogical role, communication styles, learning companions, gender differences, elementary school students, visual realism, 3D rendering, cartoon characters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Look at the Roles of Look & Roles in Embodied Pedagogical Agents – A User Preference Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/irg-2009-19(1)03
- The paper
- Haake, M., & Gulz, A. (2009). A Look at the Roles of Look & Roles in Embodied Pedagogical Agents – A User Preference Perspective. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.3233/irg-2009-19(1)03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.